Oh good point. Since he wasn't born until after the 1871 census, I'm kinda stuck. But since he was the only child residing with Philip and Winifred, it seems unlikely that Philip had any issues with him and changed his name. I'm seriously thinking that Winifred was living with a man by the name of Blake and she did what so many common-law wives did in the Courts, she just used his last name for "appearances". Of course, he probably absconded and as it appears Winifred either wasn't able or couldn't be on her own due to societal issues, she found another man who fathered Catherine and bingo, he was gone as well prior to the relationship with Philip.
It appears that Winifred DID have one more child, either by Philip Clarke, or even another man after his death in 1882--I know a child died by 1911 as she stated in the 1911 Census that she had had 3 children, and 2 were still living. Yet, I've always wondered if that other child did survive, and she considered Catherine to be "dead." Or was she in contact with my Catherine all along and knew that Kate had died by the time of the 1911 census? It wasn't unheard of for home children to remain in contact with parents and siblings.
You and I will have to see what we can find! Wouldn't it be wild to find another sibling for our mutual ancestors out there!
I almost have the pages done and they'll be uploaded today...of course with the time difference I may not get done before you're snoozing, but you can muddle through it all tomorrow.
NE