Author Topic: Still Births  (Read 2486 times)

Offline charlotteCH

  • Deceased † Rest In Peace
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • ********
  • Posts: 5,175
  • Genealogy's worth chatting about.
    • View Profile
Re: Still Births
« Reply #9 on: Wednesday 17 June 09 06:06 BST (UK) »
Joy, That copy of the form is quite unambigous... and it would seem that registering a still birth was the way to go.
A tough call on the parent who did the registering :(

charlotte

Offline Guy Etchells

  • Deceased † Rest In Peace
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • ********
  • Posts: 4,632
    • View Profile
Re: Still Births
« Reply #10 on: Wednesday 17 June 09 07:31 BST (UK) »
Does anyone know what the law was/is about stillbirths and civil registration?

charlotte

The various Acts of Parliament are available on my website at
http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~framland/acts/actind.htm

The first Act mentioning still-births is the 1874 Act.
Cheers
Guy
PS Still-births did not have to be registered until 1st July 1927 as required by the Births & Deaths Registration Act 1926.
Prior to that a doctors certificate or a declaration that the child was still-born was required before the body could be buried.
http://anguline.co.uk/Framland/index.htm   The site that gives you facts not promises!
http://burial-inscriptions.co.uk Tombstones & Monumental Inscriptions.

As we have gained from the past, we owe the future a debt, which we pay by sharing today.