Author Topic: Raynor births (Completed - thank-you)  (Read 1637 times)

Offline Brie

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,126
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Raynor births (Completed - thank-you)
« on: Sunday 25 October 09 10:27 GMT (UK) »
Hi,

I am looking for the births/christenings of Elizabeth, Millicent, Sarah and Edward Raynor b. 1660s ish to Catherine and Thomas Raynor.

On the IGI there are submitted records for Wollaton that would match for Millicent and Sarah.

Thank-you
Brie














Offline sunflower

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,079
    • View Profile
Re: Raynor births
« Reply #1 on: Sunday 25 October 09 14:30 GMT (UK) »
Hi Brie

Here are a few, but baptised to John & Catherine. All the names fit

Millicentia bapt 28.06.1665 to Joannis & Catherine REYNER
Catherina bapt 27.08.1666     Ditto                 Ditto
Sara bapt 28.10.1667             Ditto                 Ditto            (Generos)
John bapt 02.05.1669  to John & Catherine REYNER (gent)
Edward bapt 27.05. 1670 to John & Catherine REYNER (gent)

All baptised at Wollaton

Carol
Derby- Bamford,Slater,Marriott,Lee,Fox,Hopkinson,Hawksley, Furniss, Froggatt, Stodd.
Notts - Breeding, Lacey Marriott ,Kershaw,Chambers,Geeson,Mitchell,Watts,Potts,Slack,Robinson, Cooper
Yorkshire - Potts, Bell, Derbyshire, Kershaw
Worcestershire - Dyson, Summers, Dearn, Jones
Warwickshire - Russon
Leicestershire - Stodd, Sarson, Berridge, Watts, Bradshaw.
Middlesex / Surrey - Markham, Pearce, Kalaher, Barrett

This information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Brie

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,126
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Raynor births
« Reply #2 on: Sunday 25 October 09 15:50 GMT (UK) »
Thanks Carol,

It does look the correct lot. My mistake about Thomas/John. It is John - I was confusing myself.
John Reynor married Catherine Charlton 1662/3 (depending on calendar)

The children's grandpa Thomas Charlton mentions the girls Elizabeth, Millicent and Sarah in that order in his will
so at a guess Elizabeth could be born first and bapt. elsewhere. Edward is also mentioned in the will. No John and Catherine in the will so perhaps they died young.

Thanks again

Brie (and my mum who is busy transcribing the will  :))