William POOLE

[Ochsenkopff]

Hi Toni
Thank you for that site but now I am not sure if it is going to be any help for me but I will still go there just incase.

Thanks for caring.

Colin

[Ochsenkopff]

Hi Toni
Went to that site but unfortunately needed time before 1837 but never know may come in handy.
Cheshire has a very simular site.

Thanks again

Colin

[trish1120]

Hi Colin,
Just to let you know I am totally confused

Lets back up.
Your John POOLE is born abt 1815, Brimscombe, Glous.
He is a ag lab 1881, ag lab 1871, bailiff 1861.
Married to Matilda.
Has 2 sons;
William 1845
Thomas 1853, both born Maneyhampton, Glous

Have you found them in 1851? I havent.


Unless you have info that is conclusive you cannot assume that William/George/John in 1841 census are brothers. The could just be cousins.

On his marriage cert Father is Thomas?
His Fathers occupation?
Witnesses?

Trish
 

[Ochsenkopff]

Hi Trish
Will get back to you on this one as I want to make sure of my facts but I believe in the 1851 Census his name was listed as Daniel Poole and he married as Daniel Poole I believe 1842 after having an illigitement child in 1840 but the child was in the name of Parker.
On the marriage Certificate the signed name was Thomas not Daniel  probable not by him, that was his fathersw name.

All very confusing.

Colin

[Ochsenkopff]

Hi Trish
Where to start, lets go to the christening of George Parker on the 3rd December 1840 at Poulton Gloucester.
Parent Matilda Parker.
Matilda Parker marries Daniel Poole A bachelor, lab. age either 28 or 22 had to make out but I think it is 22, father of Dasniel is Thomas, married 16th May 1842 at Maiseyhampton both Matilda are said to be of Maisey Hampton signed with an X only Thomas was written in the place 0of Daniel where he was suppose to sign.
Witnesses were Elizabeth Parker who was the sister to Matilda and John ?..son.

George Parker 20 marries Harriet Jane Larner 18in Colesbourne
Father of George Parker is given as JOHN DANIEL POOLE

In answer to your question of the 1851 Census John Poole is given as Daniel Poole and from there on he keeps the name of John as you have found.

George christened  as Parker Marries as Parker Dies as Parker but in the 1861 Census for Poulton his name is Pool.

So confusing I agree.

Looking for John Poole or Daniel Poole the only John found in the area of Brimscombe was with a William, Elizabeth and George,  John was around the aged I needed so was trying to trace William and George Poole to see if their father was Thomas and if so May have been able to place them to-gether.

Minchinhampton and Stroud have been looked into and nothing comes up.

Hope I have not confused you any more.


Colin

 

[Ochsenkopff]

Hi Trish
The 1861 Census for George Pool [Parker] should have been for Ampney St.Peter not Poulton as I had told you in my previous message, thought I had better clear that up.
Sorry for any mistakes in my last message too but this keyboard plays up a lot.

Colin

[trish1120]

Wow

Let me have bit of time to look at all of this. I will get back to this thread tomorrow

Trish