I agree with Nick29, downside and Falkryn,
And to quote stevieuk
I can see your point with that comment its all Open Source, but if thats your view then I presume you have the same view of the Linux O/S which is also Open Source, which is a very secure O/S?
I agree with your question mark. From Wikipedia, two quotes:
Linux distributions are maintained by individuals, loose-knit teams, volunteer organizations, and commercial entities. A distribution is responsible for the default configuration of the installed Linux kernel, general system security, and more generally integration of the different software packages into a coherent whole
distributions may be specialized for different purposes including: computer architecture support, embedded systems, stability, security, localization to a specific region or language, targeting of specific user groups, etc.
So Linux in itself is not secure, it has to be made so, like IE, by people, just like people who work for IE.
What I am confident about is that with all the years of attack against the world's most popular browser, IE's software (and hardware design?) people are highly tuned to understanding new attacks and repelling them and I would prefer having people like them protecting my pc long term.
And what do we want from security? Just look at how easy it is for a simple-minded person to hack into the USA government's system; and how they are too cowardly to take the blame for the security holes of their own making so wish to extradite and prosecute the boy who said "look, the emperor has no clothes on"!
At the end of the day, security begins at home, how you browse and how you set your system up. I haven't had one trojan or other nasty since my daughters have grown up and left home
If you want to describe my browsing: call me boring but call me safe
cheers, falcybe