Pages: 1 [2] 3

Author Topic: 1871 George Barrow  (Read 2674 times)

Offline NicoC

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 181
    • View Profile
Re: 1871 George Barrow
« Reply #9 on: Thursday 17 March 05 22:39 GMT (UK) »
Yeah, that's great thanks. That's where he was in 1881 too. Makes you wonder if maybe he didn't live with his dad? NicoX
Monmouthshire-Allcock,
Bromsgrove/ Bham- Palmer,
East Sussex- Barrow,
Somerset- Heal,
East Sussex- Beal,
Warwickshire- Commanders,
Bromsgrove-Banner,
Bham/ West bromwich- Hale,
Monmouth/ Hereford- Watkins,
Stffordshire- Street, Siddall,
Warwickshire/ Worcestershire- Pearcey,
Aberdeenshire- Gerrie
& ubiquitous Smith (Shropshire, Herefordshire & Stockton)!

Offline Yoz

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 94
    • View Profile
Re: 1871 George Barrow
« Reply #10 on: Thursday 17 March 05 22:43 GMT (UK) »
He was a nephew in 1881 so presumable Mary Ann was George senior's sister?

Poor Ellen, she would have had 3 kids all under 4 years so maybe George was the naughty one and banished to his aunt's house!!

Offline Yoz

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 94
    • View Profile
Re: 1871 George Barrow
« Reply #11 on: Thursday 17 March 05 22:47 GMT (UK) »
George Junior looks as though he inherited Tilement in 1901.

There is no sign of Richard or Mary Message in 1901.

Offline Yoz

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 94
    • View Profile
Re: 1871 George Barrow
« Reply #12 on: Thursday 17 March 05 22:48 GMT (UK) »
No jumping in with both feet, they are now in Heathfield, do you want this???

Offline NicoC

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 181
    • View Profile
Re: 1871 George Barrow
« Reply #13 on: Thursday 17 March 05 22:51 GMT (UK) »
Go on then, I am intrigued....

Nico

P.S.  Apparently (and completely by the by) George married a Harriett Beal & she spent all his money. He ended up losing everything and going to live on a farm on church land!
Monmouthshire-Allcock,
Bromsgrove/ Bham- Palmer,
East Sussex- Barrow,
Somerset- Heal,
East Sussex- Beal,
Warwickshire- Commanders,
Bromsgrove-Banner,
Bham/ West bromwich- Hale,
Monmouth/ Hereford- Watkins,
Stffordshire- Street, Siddall,
Warwickshire/ Worcestershire- Pearcey,
Aberdeenshire- Gerrie
& ubiquitous Smith (Shropshire, Herefordshire & Stockton)!

Offline Yoz

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 94
    • View Profile
Re: 1871 George Barrow
« Reply #14 on: Thursday 17 March 05 22:59 GMT (UK) »
RG12/777 Folio:    161  Page 3 

Church St, Rose Cottage

Richard Message, h, m, 84, farmer, Warbleton
Mary A. R. Message, wife, 54, Heathfield
William J. Barrow, nephew, s, 22, house boy domestic serv, Warbleton
Faith L. Fieldwish?, serv, 13, Chiddingly

I reckon his young wife must have kept him going don't you???


do you want George and Harriet in 1891 and 1901???


MODERATOR COMMENT: Post Edited.  Please see:http://www.rootschat.com/forum/copyright.php

Offline NicoC

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 181
    • View Profile
Re: 1871 George Barrow
« Reply #15 on: Thursday 17 March 05 23:06 GMT (UK) »
Have got them in 1901 but 1891 would be great. THanks you're an absolute star!! Do you think I should rename my thread to 1861 for George? have found a birth for Ann walter Coleman but no death!!! Did they get divorced in those days? Or perhaps Richard kept her hidden at his house as a second wife and that's what was keeping her young!!!
Monmouthshire-Allcock,
Bromsgrove/ Bham- Palmer,
East Sussex- Barrow,
Somerset- Heal,
East Sussex- Beal,
Warwickshire- Commanders,
Bromsgrove-Banner,
Bham/ West bromwich- Hale,
Monmouth/ Hereford- Watkins,
Stffordshire- Street, Siddall,
Warwickshire/ Worcestershire- Pearcey,
Aberdeenshire- Gerrie
& ubiquitous Smith (Shropshire, Herefordshire & Stockton)!

Offline Yoz

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 94
    • View Profile
Re: 1871 George Barrow
« Reply #16 on: Thursday 17 March 05 23:23 GMT (UK) »
1891 census - Tilement, Warbleton

George R. Barrow, h, m, 22, foreman on farm (worker), Warbleton
Harriet, wife, 20, Heathfield
Annie M, daug, 7months, Warbleton
Elsie Petitt, serv, s, 20, domestic, Stamford Hill, London

Out of interest, the two families (2 George's) are the only ones showing in Warbleton 1891.


The death may not have been transcribed yet. or she's under the patio as I am sure one or two of mine are.....

Offline solosoprano

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 31
    • View Profile
Re: 1871 George Barrow
« Reply #17 on: Thursday 24 March 05 09:31 GMT (UK) »
hi you guys sure that Pelemons isnt just bad writing for tilement?
Pages: 1 [2] 3