Author Topic: Thomas Richey and kin 1914 and earlier  (Read 43568 times)

Offline DarrenMW

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 463
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Thomas Richey and kin 1914 and earlier
« Reply #9 on: Friday 26 February 10 17:12 GMT (UK) »
WOW!

This looks like the Motherload!

I couldn't figure out the link to his sister being 'ferguson' until now!

So, he was staying with his sister and her husbands family!!!!

I am SO SO grateful!


Ohh that links with the 1891 I was just going to post

RG12 215 54 3

418 Strand, london

Alfred ferguson 36 Engravers finisher bn Strand
Cathrine 32 bn Holborn
Sidney 14 bn Leytonstone
Alfred 11 bn Strand
Florence 7 bn Holborn
Thomas Richey 25 unm brother-in-law Army Reservist bn Holborn

Offline JenB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 17,286
    • View Profile
Re: Thomas Richey and kin 1914 and earlier
« Reply #10 on: Friday 26 February 10 17:15 GMT (UK) »
Just dropping in to say that I have just replied to a posting about this same Thomas Richey on the Durham board. http://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php/topic,440451.new.html#new
We are in danger of duplicate postings

Jennifer
All Census Look Ups Are Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline lizdb

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 25,307
    • View Profile
Re: Thomas Richey and kin 1914 and earlier
« Reply #11 on: Friday 26 February 10 17:17 GMT (UK) »
Alfred and Catherine Ferguson are at RG11 329 14 23 in 1881
Thomas Richey is not with them then, though

But there are Hollingsworth rellies there (ties in with marriage Tazzie found)

(I've just linked the threads, Jen, and suggested replies go on here. As you say we dont want people duplicating effort and wasting time looking up what has already been looked up!)
Edmonds/Edmunds - mainly Sussex
DeBoo - London
Green - Suffolk
Parker - Sussex
Kemp - Essex
Farrington - Essex
Boniface - West Sussex

census information is Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline DarrenMW

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 463
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Thomas Richey and kin 1914 and earlier
« Reply #12 on: Friday 26 February 10 17:18 GMT (UK) »
Hi Jen!

Thank you sincerely for your post.

We have determined Thomas Richey(1868) and his sister Catherine Elizabeth Ferguson(1875)  born in Holborn, London.

However, I still don't know about his father Robert Ritchie who was an actor.

There is still anagging possibility he had Durham connections.

 :)



Just dropping in to say that I have just replied to a posting about this same Thomas Richey on the Durham board. http://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php/topic,440451.new.html#new
We are in danger of duplicate postings

Jennifer


Offline DarrenMW

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 463
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Thomas Richey and kin 1914 and earlier
« Reply #13 on: Friday 26 February 10 17:23 GMT (UK) »
Liz, is there and address for them in 1881?

The only confusion i have is that Thomas Richey is given as 25 in 1891, yer 46 in 1914 on his army papers and also 46 on his marriage cert in June 1915...

Seems to be a couple years difference.

That said, the connection to the Strand (where he enlisted in 1915- Maiden Lane) and the match of next of kin sister Catherine Ferguson is impossible to ignore.

I am so appreciative of all of this treasure trove of help!




Alfred and Catherine Ferguson are at RG11 329 14 23 in 1881
Thomas Richey is not with them then, though

(I've just linked the threads, Jen, and suggested replies go on here. As you say we dont want people duplicating effort and wasting time looking up what has already been looked up!)

Offline avm228

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 24,827
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Thomas Richey and kin 1914 and earlier
« Reply #14 on: Friday 26 February 10 17:23 GMT (UK) »
Alfred and Catherine Ferguson are at RG11 329 14 23 in 1881
Thomas Richey is not with them then, though


The 1881 yields useful further relatives - a sister for Catherine (Helen HOLLINGWORTH  b abt 1860 London) and an aunt (Catherine HOLLINGWORTH, unm, b abt 1826 Southampton).
Ayr: Barnes, Wylie
Caithness: MacGregor
Essex: Eldred (Pebmarsh)
Gloucs: Timbrell (Winchcomb)
Hants: Stares (Wickham)
Lincs: Maw, Jackson (Epworth, Belton)
London: Pierce
Suffolk: Markham (Framlingham)
Surrey: Gosling (Richmond)
Wilts: Matthews, Tarrant (Calne, Preshute)
Worcs: Milward (Redditch)
Yorks: Beaumont, Crook, Moore, Styring (Huddersfield); Middleton (Church Fenton); Exley, Gelder (High Hoyland); Barnes, Birchinall (Sheffield); Kenyon, Wood (Cumberworth/Denby Dale)

Offline avm228

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 24,827
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Thomas Richey and kin 1914 and earlier
« Reply #15 on: Friday 26 February 10 17:24 GMT (UK) »
Darren, you can see a transcription of the 1881 census free on www.familysearch.org.  Catherine FERGUSON appears as Katherine on this occasion.  Address is 23 Mercer St, London.
Ayr: Barnes, Wylie
Caithness: MacGregor
Essex: Eldred (Pebmarsh)
Gloucs: Timbrell (Winchcomb)
Hants: Stares (Wickham)
Lincs: Maw, Jackson (Epworth, Belton)
London: Pierce
Suffolk: Markham (Framlingham)
Surrey: Gosling (Richmond)
Wilts: Matthews, Tarrant (Calne, Preshute)
Worcs: Milward (Redditch)
Yorks: Beaumont, Crook, Moore, Styring (Huddersfield); Middleton (Church Fenton); Exley, Gelder (High Hoyland); Barnes, Birchinall (Sheffield); Kenyon, Wood (Cumberworth/Denby Dale)

Offline DarrenMW

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 463
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Thomas Richey and kin 1914 and earlier
« Reply #16 on: Friday 26 February 10 17:25 GMT (UK) »
The Hollingsworth name rings a bell with my Mother who i just now spoke to, She doesnt have specifics, but recalls the name on the Richey side of the family!


Alfred and Catherine Ferguson are at RG11 329 14 23 in 1881
Thomas Richey is not with them then, though

But there are Hollingsworth rellies there (ties in with marriage Tazzie found)

(I've just linked the threads, Jen, and suggested replies go on here. As you say we dont want people duplicating effort and wasting time looking up what has already been looked up!)

Offline JenB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 17,286
    • View Profile
Re: Thomas Richey and kin 1914 and earlier
« Reply #17 on: Friday 26 February 10 17:27 GMT (UK) »
Quote
There is still a nagging possibility he had Durham connections.

Can you enlarge on this, please?
All Census Look Ups Are Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk