Appears to be them in 1841 badly mistranscribed.
In Great Ellingham.
The image is Banham.
Robert Barnhouse, 50, Ag Lab
Elizabeth Barnhouse, 50
William Barnhouse, 20, Carpenter
Sarah Barnhouse, 15
Eliza Barnhouse, 14
Baptism;
15 Jul 1827, St James, Great Ellingham
WILLIAM/ELIZA/SARAH ANNE Banham
Parents ROBERT/ELIZABETH
Father a Labourer
Note on Baptism of William;
No Age Given But Word Aged Written Between Name And Son Of
Burials;
St Mary, Attlenorough
ROBERT Banham 12 Oct 1853 age 65
ELIZABETH Banham 19 Sep 1870 age 79
1861 Census
William Banham, 38, Carpenter
Frances Banham, 42, Wife
Elizabeth Banham, 69, Mother
George Banham, 12, Nephew
There is a Bapt 1849 for George, Mother ELIZA
1851 we have;
Sarah Ann Banham, 26
Eliza Banham, 24
George R Banham, 2
Mary A Banham, 5 mths
All on FreeREG
Thanks again, my tree is looking so much cleaner now.
There is some difficulty with the children of Robert and Elizabeth when we look at the christenings.
Phoebe christened 1812, Banham
Mary Ann christened 1815, Watton
Jane christened 1816, Watton
Edward christened 1820, Watton
Jane christened 29 March 1822, Watton
William christened 26 May 1822, New Buckenham (non-conformist)
Humphrey christened 26 May 1822, New Buckenham (non-conformist)William christened 1827, Great Ellingham
Sarah christened 1827, Great Ellingham
Eliza christened 1827, Great Ellingham
The New Buckenham kids could look like they are from another couple, except that William's date matches so well with the later census mentioned by Trish of a William aged 20 in 1841, and the name Humphrey seems so obviously to come from Elizabeth's maiden name. If all but the New Buckenhams are from other parents, then what do we do with the 1841 census which has Sarah and Eliza as siblings at the correct ages? If William was christened twice (to me this is the most likely scenario), the second time in an Anglican church, then what do we do with Jane being christened in Watton just months before her brothers?