Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5

Author Topic: Too bad to be restored?  (Read 6057 times)

Offline Treetotal

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 28,450
    • View Profile
Re: Too bad to be restored?
« Reply #9 on: Friday 18 June 10 19:58 BST (UK) »
Hi Kismet....Sorry...It's the best I could do...As gadget said...we really need a higher res scan to bring out the detail...you either get detail with damage or no damage at the cost of detail ::).
Carol
CAPES Hull. KIRK  Leeds, Hull. JONES  Wales,  Lancashire. CARROLL Ireland, Lancashire, U.S.A. BROUGHTON Leicester, Goole, Hull BORRILL  Lincolnshire, Durham, Hull. GROOM  Wishbech, Hull. ANTHONY St. John's Nfld. BUCKNALL Lincolnshire, Hull. BUTT Harbour Grace, Newfoundland. PARSONS  Western Bay, Newfoundland. MONAGHAN  Ireland, U.S.A. PERRY Cheshire, Liverpool.
 
RESTORERS:PLEASE DO NOT USE MY RESTORES WITHOUT PRIOR PERMISSION - THANK YOU

Offline Gadget

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 57,142
    • View Profile
Re: Too bad to be restored?
« Reply #10 on: Friday 18 June 10 20:00 BST (UK) »
Hi all

Kismet has sent me a larger scan- not checked it up yet but if anyone wants it, do PM me and I'll send it on :)
I'm off this weekend now so won't be doing anything on it until next week

Mine's a bit like that , Carol. Tis a difficult one.


Gadget
Census &  BMD information Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk and GROS - www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk

***Restorers - Please do not use my restores without my permission. Thanks***

Offline Emjaybee

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,944
  • Yer I be again
    • View Profile
Re: Too bad to be restored?
« Reply #11 on: Saturday 19 June 10 07:53 BST (UK) »
Colour not required
Beard Voyce, Scrivens in Worcestershire

Offline kismet

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 230
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Too bad to be restored?
« Reply #12 on: Saturday 19 June 10 09:05 BST (UK) »
I suddenly thought - I can provide a picture of the man himself which, although older, would give an idea of his actual features.

Many thanks to all of you for taking on this challenge - the results so far are most interesting - although I have to say I prefer monochrome.

Kismet
Parker:  Bath, Birmingham, Reading & London
Packer: Bitton, Glos & Birmingham
Webb:  Towcester & London 
King/Collett:  London
Young:  Goxhill, Lincs
Olds/Hopes:  Bitton, Glos
Blumenthal/Dale:  Germany, Liverpool, Bournemouth & Southampton 
Klein/Keene:  Liverpool, Swindon & Reading
Fasser/Fiszer & Berliner:  Poland & Liverpool
Suffolk:  Lutterworth

Offline billkent

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,600
  • P/Cs can be fun.
    • View Profile
Re: Too bad to be restored?
« Reply #13 on: Saturday 19 June 10 14:39 BST (UK) »
Sorry it's taken so long Kismet... took ages building the wall.  ::)

Bill.  ;)
Feel free to alter/modify or colour any restores done by me.

 Leeves families. Kent and Sussex.
Baker family. Surrey.

Offline kismet

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 230
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Too bad to be restored?
« Reply #14 on: Saturday 19 June 10 17:17 BST (UK) »
Interesting result.   :)

Attached is another copy, scanned this time at 600dpi.  But can I be picky and ask for monochrome please.  Sorry.   :-*

Kismet

Parker:  Bath, Birmingham, Reading & London
Packer: Bitton, Glos & Birmingham
Webb:  Towcester & London 
King/Collett:  London
Young:  Goxhill, Lincs
Olds/Hopes:  Bitton, Glos
Blumenthal/Dale:  Germany, Liverpool, Bournemouth & Southampton 
Klein/Keene:  Liverpool, Swindon & Reading
Fasser/Fiszer & Berliner:  Poland & Liverpool
Suffolk:  Lutterworth

Offline billkent

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,600
  • P/Cs can be fun.
    • View Profile
Re: Too bad to be restored?
« Reply #15 on: Saturday 19 June 10 17:39 BST (UK) »
I'll meet you half way Kismet.  ;) ...Your new picture is showing at 72dpi.
Feel free to alter/modify or colour any restores done by me.

 Leeves families. Kent and Sussex.
Baker family. Surrey.

Offline kismet

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 230
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Too bad to be restored?
« Reply #16 on: Saturday 19 June 10 17:49 BST (UK) »
Thank you Bill.

Strange that the 600dpi should be showing at the same resolution as the first one which was scanned at 300dpi.

Kismet
Parker:  Bath, Birmingham, Reading & London
Packer: Bitton, Glos & Birmingham
Webb:  Towcester & London 
King/Collett:  London
Young:  Goxhill, Lincs
Olds/Hopes:  Bitton, Glos
Blumenthal/Dale:  Germany, Liverpool, Bournemouth & Southampton 
Klein/Keene:  Liverpool, Swindon & Reading
Fasser/Fiszer & Berliner:  Poland & Liverpool
Suffolk:  Lutterworth

Offline billkent

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,600
  • P/Cs can be fun.
    • View Profile
Re: Too bad to be restored?
« Reply #17 on: Saturday 19 June 10 18:11 BST (UK) »
The first one was showing 72dpi. on Photoshop.

Bill.
Feel free to alter/modify or colour any restores done by me.

 Leeves families. Kent and Sussex.
Baker family. Surrey.
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5