The problem with cremation is the large amount of fuel it takes to burn a human body, very environmentally unfriendly - not to mention release of mercury, other heavy metals, dioxins etc into the atmosphere.
Robert
The newer more modern Cremators are more efficient, most of the fuel used is in the process of Pre-Heating the cremators. The efficiency of a cremator is dependent on several factors, No. of cremations taking place per day more cremations = greater efficency. Emission control is very strict & each crematoria must comply with a permit to operate, there are now a number of crematoria that have Filtration (Abatement Plant) fitted to further reduce emissions & remove almost all nasties from the emissions.
At present DEFRA requires a temperature of greater than 850C in Secondary chambers, where Abatement is fitted this temperature is reduced to 800C, making a huge environmental saving.
I could go into some more details, but it`d be better in a separate thread.
Resomation looks interesting, would like to know what they use though. I believe freeze-drying in something like liquid nitrogen has also been suggested, the body crumbles to dust.
Robert
Resomation, as the process is based on Alkaline Hydrolysis, I`d guess it uses something similar to Caustic soda , which is very Alkaline (PH 13) & just as dangerous as Hydrochloric/Sulfuric Acid (PH 1).
Freeze-drying is called Promession, & is a much longer process than the 2 methods above, in brief, the body (& coffin) are frozen to -19C for 24 hrs, then dipped in Liquid Nitrogen & then basically shaken to bits, the nasties like heavy metal, mercury etc are removed along with the water, then packaged in a box for burial.
Again all the above are very brief descriptions.
Cremation took many years to become accepted as an environmental way to dispose of bodies, so I guess the other 2 options will take a few years?
Apologises for going off-topic & for the long post, but I could have gone on further.
Regards.
Steve