kathleen (kate) milburn of london

[lynette ford]

i am looking at possibilities for kate b 1884 everton/liverpool who lived in 1891c with parents william/mary in bromley. sister was catherine b 1890 bromley and also called kate later. in 1901c only 'kate' b 1890 found and in 1911c only one close match but wrong birth district. no fbmd record so did she die between 1891 and 1911 and/or married?
lynette ford (milburn)

[karenlee]

Hi there

Marriage Register
North Peckham All Saints
Southward
July 19th 1915

Frank SKINNER 21 Bachelor Soldier of 45 East Surrey Grove Father = George William SKINNER ( Deceased ) Bus Washer

Kate MILBOURNE 22 Spinster Packer of 45 East Surrey Grove Father = Robert Rowley MILBOURNE Carpenter

Both bride and groom signed
Witnesses were Arthur David CLEMENTS and Margaret MILBOURNE

Cheers
Karenlee

[karenlee]

Baptism Register
Camberwell St George
Southwark

Kate daughter of Robert Rowley and Ellen Sarah MILBOURNE of 14 Victory Terrace Baptised June 29th 1890.  Father's Occupation Blind Maker.

Also baptised to this couple all on 2nd Sept 1888 were

Charles Henry
Daisy Alice
Emma Elizabeth
Frederick George
May Annie

Also

Stanley Arthur 3rd Mar 1889
Margaret Malalah 9th April 1893

Cheers
Karenlee

[lynette ford]

hi karenlee

thank you and, you appear to have solved a problem

data does not fit and likely skinner was not her m name

milburn was correct spelling but at times there was variance (eg melbourne used twice in census)

reason being kathleen was b 1884 to william and mary

she was called kate in 1891c and she had a sister catherine b 1890
in 1901c, there was only kate b 1890 in 1901 so this was kate?

what happened to original kate, did she die between 1891 and 1901?

1911c had few kates and one b 1884 (stated from essex) presumed to be mispelling (milbourn) but now we do not think so

do fbmd record of early kate death or marriage other than to a hugh myott 1924 chelsea 1a-944. no myott child so perhaps she did m hugh, or she died 1891/1911

regards

lynette