Can you read this for me please?

[carol8353]

What year is it from- might be easier if we had a bit more to compare enumerators style of handwriting.

I'll look it up if I knew when it was.

Carol

[carol8353]

Found these marriages could she be one of the Elizabeths?
Sadly THREE of them 

Surname  First name(s)    District  Vol  Page 

~~~~~~~~
Marriages Mar 1851
~~~~~~~~
 
BREARY  MARY    LEEDS  23 424   
Carr  Elizabeth     Leeds  23 424   
Davis  Elizabeth     Leeds  23 424   
Eddison  George     Leeds  23 424   
Ellis  Jesse     Leeds  23 424   
Norton  Thomas     Leeds  23 424   
Pottage  John Samuel     Leeds  23 424   
Wild  Elizabeth     Leeds  23 424   

[Sisterjane]

i think its Ralph
Joe

[Ticker]

Thanks everyone for your help.

I have posted a larger section below which may help - my lot are at the bottom.

Best wishes

Ticker

[Tati]

I'd say just as JillJ. 

Second one is 'Elizth'- looks like Ruth at first sight but the letter before the 'th' is definitely a 'z'.

Tanja 


   

[Kennington]

Hi Ticker,

The same name is at the top of your list, a short form of Elizabeth.
Its a bit clearer there.

Mary

[Bryan.]

Hi Ticker........is this the family you refer to:

John S. Pottage   aged    43  head       Wakefield
Elizabeth Pottage  aged  46  wife        Tockwith
John Pottage         aged  14  son         Wakefield
James W. Pottage  aged  7   son               "
Charles W  Pottage   aged    5  son               "    
  1871 census.


Bryan

[Ticker]

That's the one Bryan.  But I wasn't sure I agreed with the transcription.

Thanks

Ticker

[Ticker]

Hi Ticker,

The same name is at the top of your list, a short form of Elizabeth.
Its a bit clearer there.

Mary

Hi Mary

I thought it was probably the same as the one at the top which is why I included that one.  Thanks for your help.

Best wishes

Ticker