« Reply #21 on: Sunday 14 November 10 22:20 GMT (UK) »
Not clear from Tony's web page whether the kettles in question had a permanent flex or not, but they probably did? I've been thinking of a modern electric kettle, where you can remove the whole thing from the electrical supply.
From what I can see Igor the flex was removable.
According to the diagrams on the oldelectrickettle site, the flex adjoined the kettle underneath the centre or back of the kettle.This would necessitate the provision of legs on the kettles. I would concede however that 4 shillings and 6 pence would be extraordinarily cheap for an electic kettle
The objects underneath the kettles in the picture seem to have, upon close examination, particularly the one on the left of the window, a slot opening, which I would not think to find on a paraffin heater. I would also think that a paraffin heater would not be a particularly efficent way to boil a kettle. Even today's non-electric kettles require the heat source to be in direct contact with the base of the kettle. Perhaps they were just a convenient way of displaying the kettles?
The fact remains that, whether they are electric or not, this would not adversely affect the dating of the picture as electric kettles were available as early as the turn of the century.
Tony
Lynn:- Shelton, Edwards, Looker, Platt, Ames, Bagley, Cadman, Cokes, Edmunds, Seymour, Waldren, Mulloy, Cockin/Cockayne
Tony:- Davies, Murphy, Kidd, Elwell, Pither, Roper, Marshall, Whelan, Lycett, Farley, Turner, Rhodes