Hi Valda
Thanks again for your reply with your info and links.
John South is proving a great frustration for me and i'm now having serious doubts that i actually have the right John South.
If everyone can forgive my indulgence here,i would be delighted to hear from Rootchatters as to whether i have the right man or not.
Here's all the info that I have (in chronological order) on John South:
1801: John South marries Lucy Buckingham in Colchester, Essex.
Both listed as being of the parish (St Mary Magdalen)
1802: daughter Lucy South is born in Colchester.
1803: son John South is born in Colchester.
1816: son Samuel South is baptised in Colchester. Father is listed as being 'late of Royal Artillery'.
(Samuel was aged:
30 in 1841 census,
42 in 1851 b. Colchester
50 in 1861 b. Woolwich, Kent
64 in 1871 b. Colchester
74 in 1881 b. Woolwich. Kent.)
1840: a John South,aged 66, is admitted into Greenwich.
He is listed as being a widower,living in St Pancras, London and who was born in Brentford, Middlesex.
1841: census ~ John South aged 70, in Greenwich Hospital
1841: census ~ John South aged 68,a labourer, lodging in Lexden Heath,Colchester.
1841: census ~ Lucy South aged 66 living in Colchester with her son, John South.
1847: John South dies Q3 1950 in Colchester. (no age given but not the son John South who died in 1847).
1850 (April) ~ John South dies in Greenwich Hospital aged 75 years.
1851: census: Lucy South ( 73) widower, living on parish relief - widow of a sailor.)
1860: Lucy South dies in Colchester aged 86.
I'm intrigued that Lucy was a widow of a sailor in 1851 (even though John was 'late royal artillery' in 1816 at his sons baptism) and that their son, Samuel South, occasionally gave his place of birth as Woolwich in the census returns.
Was Woolwich where the family lived circa 1810 when his father John was in the navy?
And it was Woolwich hospital where John ended his days as an in-pensioner.
The Woolwich connection and the 'widow of a sailor' is surely too much of a coincidence?
And yet, the John South in Woolwich hospital gave his address (in 1840) as St Pancras, that he was a widower, and also that he had no children.
And who was the John South in Lexden Heath in 1841 and who died in 1850 and who was roughly the same age as the other John South?
Was the John South who entered Greenwich hospital being economical with the truth, just to get himself admitted more easily? Saying that he had no family (no dependants) might have gained him more sympathy?
So finally, was my 4x great grandfather an ex-sailor, who fought at the battle of Basque Roads, and who spent the last 10 years as an in-pensioner in Greenwich hospital. Or was he simply a labourer who lived his life in Colchester and that 'Woolwich baptism' & 'widow of a sailor' just red herrings?
Any thoughts would be very welcome.
thank you
Rob