whato ronnie
well what can i say but your an absolute star thats the first positive proof that a mahetabel murrell exists outside of the birth cert i,ve seen i,m that chuffed i nearly was going to say i wouldn,t wind you up again ( but i,m not that chuffed

) no seriously that is ground breaking news for me , i,m looking at the moment at the 1841 cen record of one thomas went and mahetabel went ( murrell ) and there son thomas whos7 months old it,s his birth cert i,ve got with her maiden name on this is the marriage i asked you about thomas went - mahetabel murrell
i never think of that church as anything else than the nat history museum let alone all saints ,all saints to me is at shrub end , that bpt date fits quite well only on this 1841 cen thomas is down as being born 1816but his age is down as 5 yrs older than met but as we know how notorious the 41 cen is for inaccuracies and the other cens i,ve got her on are of a closer age i want it to be her the times i,ve been in that place and she was bpt there all those years before , i,m getting carried away now must step back and slow down .
truly ronnie i can,t thank you enough for this
trevor
ps ian i,m sorry for hi jacking your post again
