Hello David.
Again, thank you. Your translation was a masterpiece as the illustration shows.
In fairness I should post the excerpt as found: “This surname is of French origin and the progenitor was of French Huguenot stock. The name is spelled Pulsever, Pulcifer, and in various other ways, in the early records. The name is not recognized by the authorities as an English surname, though the first settler may have been from Guernsey, or elsewhere on or near the English Channel, where many French Protestants took refuge. The nearest French resemblance to the name is Pulosevits, the pronunciation of which might give rise to the spellings in vogue during the life of the pioneer. “
It is true that I can imagine the name Pulosevits being written as postulated by the English, when spoken by the French, however, my history is not good enough to work out how it got from Serbia to France, though there has always been huge traffic of all religions being persecuted and fleeing to relative peace for a few generations . (I am sure I also read about a connection to Italy somewhere, but I can’t find it now.)
I absolutely agree that there are numbers of people willing to buy or sell anything that might pass for a genuine connection to a genuine coat of arms, and it being illegal to assume someone’s arms without permission, (and payment,) I wasn’t thinking of doing so, particularly at a distance of 250 years, however, I was very intrigued to find out more about it.
So I shall hope that this isn’t the end of the puzzle. And someone may yet come up with more. Thanks again for your time and interest, best wishes.