Author Topic: Using incorrect names on census  (Read 694 times)

Offline GAJM1

  • -
  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 290
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Using incorrect names on census
« on: Wednesday 20 April 11 22:59 BST (UK) »
Hi I have a couple who had a family out of wed lock between 1900 to 1920 in Massachusetts. Now in the 1910 Census they used the wrong first names.  The first names they used are not their middle names or anything like that. So they were making the first names up. Would their have being a reason a couple might what to hide on census especially if they were not married and having children?

Castlemcauliffe

Offline Genealiza

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,629
    • View Profile
Re: Using incorrect names on census
« Reply #1 on: Thursday 21 April 11 15:38 BST (UK) »
Could they have been "nicknames" used by the family?

Offline anitah1972

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 70
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Using incorrect names on census
« Reply #2 on: Thursday 28 April 11 14:24 BST (UK) »
Are you certain you're not looking at siblings or a separate pair of people altogether?   

Also: I'm finding that with the standard naming systems (First born male named after father's father, etc) that there can end up being several people of the same name in the same generation in the same area - and so middle names and nicknames seem to be common in order to differentiate. 

LEWNES/LIOUNIS from Greece, settled in Brooklyn, Kings, NYC, USA
ZBORAZ/SBORAI/SPORAY from Austria/Hungary/Czechoslovakia, settled in Pennsylvania, USA
GRAY from Galasheils/Hawick, Scotland
BAIN, SETH, GARDNER, DOUGLAS from Falkirk/Bo'ness/Linlithgow/Dumbarton, Scotland
MCGREGOR/MCGRIGOR/JARVIS from Scotland