Author Topic: Lilian E Hingley, confused re parents.  (Read 2362 times)

Offline CAZI

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 8
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Lilian E Hingley, confused re parents.
« on: Wednesday 04 May 11 00:44 BST (UK) »
Thanks to this great website I have discovered that my Gt Grandmother was Lilian Elsie Hingley born in 1889/90. According to the 1901 census she was 12 and living in Walworth London, however, the head of the family is called Walter Whorlay and his wife Minnie. She is listed as daughter. The strange thing is the difference in the surnames as they have several older children with the surname Whorlay and then several younger ones with the surname Hingley, all listed as sons and daughters. Surely is there had been a remarriage this would have been the other way round. Has anyone any idea why this may be listed this way as I am very confused. ???

Thanks

Offline karenlee

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,662
  • Drive it like ya stole it.
    • View Profile
Re: Lilian E Hingley, confused re parents.
« Reply #1 on: Wednesday 04 May 11 00:50 BST (UK) »

Was Minnie much younger than Walter WHORLAY.... his children from his first marriage could well have been much older than any children Minnie HINGLEY  had from her first marriage??
Census Information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline danuslave

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,882
  • My fashion sense isn't any better now!
    • View Profile
Re: Lilian E Hingley, confused re parents.
« Reply #2 on: Wednesday 04 May 11 01:13 BST (UK) »
Hi CAZI & welcome to RootsChat

I'm having a job finding this family on the 1901 census.  Do you have the census reference - Piece/Folio/Page?

Linda
MOXHAM/MOXAM - Wiltshire & Surrey
SKEATS - Surrey
BRETT - Kent & County Durham
and
SWINBANK - anywhere

Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline karenlee

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,662
  • Drive it like ya stole it.
    • View Profile
Re: Lilian E Hingley, confused re parents.
« Reply #3 on: Wednesday 04 May 11 01:20 BST (UK) »


Was just about to post same Linda....  great minds?? :o ;D
Census Information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Offline danuslave

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,882
  • My fashion sense isn't any better now!
    • View Profile
Re: Lilian E Hingley, confused re parents.
« Reply #4 on: Wednesday 04 May 11 01:26 BST (UK) »
Something like that   :)
MOXHAM/MOXAM - Wiltshire & Surrey
SKEATS - Surrey
BRETT - Kent & County Durham
and
SWINBANK - anywhere

Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline karenlee

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,662
  • Drive it like ya stole it.
    • View Profile
Re: Lilian E Hingley, confused re parents.
« Reply #5 on: Wednesday 04 May 11 01:31 BST (UK) »


I can see a baptism that might be hers... looks like they baptised a lot of their family on the same day


Walworth All Saints

Lilian Elsie daughter of Josiah Thomas and Annie HINGLEY of 36 Alvey Street. Baptised Aug 15th 1900  Born May 10th 1889.  Father's Occupation Engineers

Karenlee
Census Information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline CAZI

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 8
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Lilian E Hingley, confused re parents.
« Reply #6 on: Wednesday 04 May 11 01:59 BST (UK) »
Hi CAZI & welcome to RootsChat

I'm having a job finding this family on the 1901 census.  Do you have the census reference - Piece/Folio/Page?

Linda

I'm new to all this but I wrote down RG13/0384/~F131, is that the number. Not sure what it means.

Thanks


Cazi

Offline CAZI

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 8
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Lilian E Hingley, confused re parents.
« Reply #7 on: Wednesday 04 May 11 02:04 BST (UK) »

Was Minnie much younger than Walter WHORLAY.... his children from his first marriage could well have been much older than any children Minnie HINGLEY  had from her first marriage??

No strangely she was 5 years older than him according to the 1901 census. The Whorlay children were 17 and 15 and the Hingley's ranged from 13 to 6.

Offline karenlee

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,662
  • Drive it like ya stole it.
    • View Profile
Re: Lilian E Hingley, confused re parents.
« Reply #8 on: Wednesday 04 May 11 02:05 BST (UK) »

Looks like the name is LONGLEY to me... what do others think??
Census Information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk