Author Topic: Middlemist interpretation  (Read 1607 times)

Offline heiserca

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 385
    • View Profile
Middlemist interpretation
« on: Monday 23 May 11 20:06 BST (UK) »
The baptismal register at Yetholm, 19 January 1735, says:

"James Middlemist and Isabell Young had a child baptised pubickly called Agnes".


Does that mean:

(a) she was "baptised publickly"?, or

(b) she was "publickly called Agnes"?

Any help with interpreting this would be much appreciated.




Clezie (Clazie, Clezy, Clazy, Clazey, Claise, etc.), Lockhart, Heiser, Schwab, Tomon, Zarnowski, Megert, Iseli

Offline fifer1947

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,906
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Middlemist interpretation
« Reply #1 on: Monday 23 May 11 20:15 BST (UK) »
I think that just means she was baptised in church during the service and not in a private ceremony.
Ireland, Co Antrim: Kerr; Hollinger; Forsythe; Moore
Ireland, Co Louth: Carson; Leslie
Ireland, Co Kerry: Ferris
Scotland, Perthshire/Glasgow:  Stewart
England, Devon/Cornwall: Ferris, Gasser/Jasser/Jesser, Norman

Offline heiserca

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 385
    • View Profile
Re: Middlemist interpretation
« Reply #2 on: Tuesday 24 May 11 00:09 BST (UK) »
That was my first thought.  But Yetholm had a Gypsy or Traveller settlement - I have been told that their custom was to have two names: a public one, for use with outsiders, and a private one used only at home.  Is that true?  Her mother's surname, Young, was frequently used by the Travellers at Yetholm.




Clezie (Clazie, Clezy, Clazy, Clazey, Claise, etc.), Lockhart, Heiser, Schwab, Tomon, Zarnowski, Megert, Iseli