Poll

Why don't you test your DNA?

Too expensive
47 (34.1%)
Too Technical
8 (5.8%)
I'm scared they'll clone me
3 (2.2%)
I've already done it
52 (37.7%)
Other (explain)
28 (20.3%)

Total Members Voted: 138

Author Topic: DNA Testing - Why Not  (Read 51765 times)

Offline grandma

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,036
  • James Lynch Ferrigan & Isabella Craig
    • View Profile
Re: DNA Testing - Why Not
« Reply #153 on: Wednesday 28 December 11 15:23 GMT (UK) »
We transferred our DNA info from Ancestry to ftDNA around the middle of Dec. Any idea how long it takes for them to process the info about a possible match.

Mary

Offline davidft

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,209
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: DNA Testing - Why Not
« Reply #154 on: Friday 30 December 11 16:03 GMT (UK) »
Hello Malky.  No on the African roots for native Americans except in the sense that we all have African roots if we go back far enough.  American Indians show up in DNA tests as having an Asian profile, as had been assumed by many.

There is an excellent National Geographic program called "Journey of Man: a Genetic Odyssey on youtube.  It explains quite a bit in 2 hours in nicely digestible 10 minute chunks. 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OV6A8oGtPc4

I recall one thing pointed out in this film was that many native Americans did not want to be tested since they didn't want hear anything that might negate their creation myths.

Nick

This is interesting as sometime in 2011, or late 2010, there was a TV programme that explored the possibility of some native Americans arriving in the Americas via an Atlantic crosssing.

I can not remember the name of the programme, but by posting this hopefully someone will recall it.

Basically the hypothesis of the programme was that some ancient Europeans crossed the Atlantic by edging across the retreating Ice sheet ie walk a bit, sail a bit sort of thing. They used DNA analysis (mtDNA I think) to prove there were native Americans who had been their a long time but had not come via Asia. They also used archaeological techniques to explain some of the artefact's native Americans had but would not be expected to have had.

OK sorry if that is all a bit vague, but the programme was very good and uses a good bit of scientific fact as opposed to assumption. Hopefully someone will recall its name .....
James Stott c1775-1850. James was born in Yorkshire but where? He was a stonemason and married Elizabeth Archer (nee Nicholson) in 1794 at Ripon. They lived thereafter in Masham. If anyone has any suggestions or leads as to his birthplace I would be interested to know. I have searched for it for years without success. Thank you.

Offline davidft

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,209
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: DNA Testing - Why Not
« Reply #155 on: Friday 30 December 11 18:43 GMT (UK) »
Seems the programme I was thinking of in post 154 may have been
Ice Age Columbus

http://www.amazon.com/Ice-Columbus-Were-First-Americans/dp/B000NNN7TK

James Stott c1775-1850. James was born in Yorkshire but where? He was a stonemason and married Elizabeth Archer (nee Nicholson) in 1794 at Ripon. They lived thereafter in Masham. If anyone has any suggestions or leads as to his birthplace I would be interested to know. I have searched for it for years without success. Thank you.

Offline youngtug

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,307
    • View Profile
Re: DNA Testing - Why Not
« Reply #156 on: Friday 30 December 11 18:53 GMT (UK) »
There was a programme filmed about someone making reed boats in Africa to a native design and sailing to [or nearly, cannot remember] America. Following on from Thor Heyerdal I suppose. In "The Journey of Man" series it was the Australian Aboriginals that would not believe the DNA. The native American tribe embraced the idea. http://www.plu.edu/~ryandp/RAX.html
.http://www.rootschat.com/links/05q2/   
  WILSON;-Wiltshire.
 SOUL;-Gloucestershire.
 SANSUM;-Berkshire-Wiltshire
 BASSON-BASTON;- Berkshire,- Oxfordshire.
 BRIDGES;- Wiltshire.
 DOWDESWELL;-Wiltshire,Gloucestershire
 JORDAN;- Berkshire.
 COX;- Berkshire.
 GOUDY;- Suffolk.
 CHATFIELD;-Sussex-- London
 MORGAN;-Blaenavon-Abersychan
 FISHER;- Berkshire.
 BLOMFIELD-BLOOMFIELD-BLUMFIELD;-Suffolk.
DOVE. Essex-London
YOUNG-Berkshire
ARDEN.
PINEGAR-COLLIER-HUGHES-JEFFERIES-HUNT-MOSS-FRY


Offline Flattybasher9

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,360
  • Manners cost nothing, and are worth the effort.
    • View Profile
Re: DNA Testing - Why Not
« Reply #157 on: Friday 30 December 11 19:08 GMT (UK) »
There is also historic evidence of Viking settlement on the costal area of Newfoundland at L'Anse aux Meadows. There are a further two sites of settlement called Straumfjord in the north, and one called Hóp in the south

Regards

Malky

Offline youngtug

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,307
    • View Profile
Re: DNA Testing - Why Not
« Reply #158 on: Friday 30 December 11 19:34 GMT (UK) »
From the Saga of Greenland and the Saga of Eric the red.
.http://www.rootschat.com/links/05q2/   
  WILSON;-Wiltshire.
 SOUL;-Gloucestershire.
 SANSUM;-Berkshire-Wiltshire
 BASSON-BASTON;- Berkshire,- Oxfordshire.
 BRIDGES;- Wiltshire.
 DOWDESWELL;-Wiltshire,Gloucestershire
 JORDAN;- Berkshire.
 COX;- Berkshire.
 GOUDY;- Suffolk.
 CHATFIELD;-Sussex-- London
 MORGAN;-Blaenavon-Abersychan
 FISHER;- Berkshire.
 BLOMFIELD-BLOOMFIELD-BLUMFIELD;-Suffolk.
DOVE. Essex-London
YOUNG-Berkshire
ARDEN.
PINEGAR-COLLIER-HUGHES-JEFFERIES-HUNT-MOSS-FRY

Offline Flattybasher9

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,360
  • Manners cost nothing, and are worth the effort.
    • View Profile
Re: DNA Testing - Why Not
« Reply #159 on: Friday 30 December 11 19:44 GMT (UK) »
Not only from the "sagas" but from artifacts found.


Regards

Malky

Offline youngtug

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,307
    • View Profile
Re: DNA Testing - Why Not
« Reply #160 on: Friday 30 December 11 19:54 GMT (UK) »
Not disputing the existence of Norse sites or artifacts, I also believe to a great extent the Saga's. The sites they have found may and may not be the ones named in the Saga's. There may well have been several different meetings of peoples from the old world and America, either by accident or design but I think the theory put forward in "the journey of man" is probably correct
.http://www.rootschat.com/links/05q2/   
  WILSON;-Wiltshire.
 SOUL;-Gloucestershire.
 SANSUM;-Berkshire-Wiltshire
 BASSON-BASTON;- Berkshire,- Oxfordshire.
 BRIDGES;- Wiltshire.
 DOWDESWELL;-Wiltshire,Gloucestershire
 JORDAN;- Berkshire.
 COX;- Berkshire.
 GOUDY;- Suffolk.
 CHATFIELD;-Sussex-- London
 MORGAN;-Blaenavon-Abersychan
 FISHER;- Berkshire.
 BLOMFIELD-BLOOMFIELD-BLUMFIELD;-Suffolk.
DOVE. Essex-London
YOUNG-Berkshire
ARDEN.
PINEGAR-COLLIER-HUGHES-JEFFERIES-HUNT-MOSS-FRY

Offline Shropshire Lass

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,355
    • View Profile
Re: DNA Testing - Why Not
« Reply #161 on: Sunday 01 January 12 17:03 GMT (UK) »
Seems the programme I was thinking of in post 154 may have been
Ice Age Columbus

http://www.amazon.com/Ice-Columbus-Were-First-Americans/dp/B000NNN7TK

Is this the same - www.bbc.co.uk/science/horizon/2002/columbustrans.shtml

It was a fascinating programme.
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk