Poll

Why don't you test your DNA?

Too expensive
47 (34.1%)
Too Technical
8 (5.8%)
I'm scared they'll clone me
3 (2.2%)
I've already done it
52 (37.7%)
Other (explain)
28 (20.3%)

Total Members Voted: 138

Author Topic: DNA Testing - Why Not  (Read 51700 times)

Online heywood

  • RootsChat Honorary
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 40,868
    • View Profile
Re: DNA Testing - Why Not
« Reply #198 on: Tuesday 25 April 17 11:50 BST (UK) »
Thanks Jane. I am sure I will fathom some of it given time.  :)
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Nova67

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 881
    • View Profile
Re: DNA Testing - Why Not
« Reply #199 on: Tuesday 25 April 17 12:02 BST (UK) »
My main motivation in testing and getting multiple family members to test is to discover how long my family has been in Australia, and particularly breaking down the brickwalls of my female ancestors to VDL. I am interested in knowing my earliest convicts and their significance to the history of European settlement here.

Online brigidmac

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 6,013
  • Computer incompetent but stiil trying
    • View Profile
Re: DNA Testing - Why Not
« Reply #200 on: Tuesday 25 April 17 14:00 BST (UK) »
I ordered a kit today ...Was tempted by the offer of 2nd kit half price because i want to do both my own and my mother's

it's very expensive so i do hope some matches turn up

My father's sister is now 90 it would be good if we could get her to do it too as my father has passed away .

Roberts,Fellman.Macdermid smith jones,Bloch,Irvine,Hallis Stevenson

Offline Bobby G

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 75
    • View Profile
Re: DNA Testing - Why Not
« Reply #201 on: Saturday 29 April 17 14:40 BST (UK) »
Absolutely love how I can use DNA with my ancestry. I currently have 3 folks connected to my tree through paper and DNA. No close rellies, family have taken a test yet but I'm slowly working on that. I have my DNA in as many databases as possible (4). Have also taken a test with livingDNA, result from this will be exportable some time this year. Best decision that I took a test. Would recommend to anyone.
Researching Gambrill www.gambrillfamilytree.com Gedmatch T909876 Join our Gambrill FB Group


Offline Liviani

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 576
    • View Profile
Re: DNA Testing - Why Not
« Reply #202 on: Saturday 29 April 17 18:34 BST (UK) »
I haven't done my DNA yet, but I am very interested in getting this done.

Trouble is, I'm female. I am more interested in my paternal line. I have no brothers and I don't have a good relationship with my father for him to get a sample done.

As far as I understand if I was to do a test it would trace through my mother, then her mother, her mother and so on?
I will probably do it out of curiosity at some point. 

If my son (he is still a child so I'm not sure if this is allowed?) had his DNA analysed would this show his father's line only and nothing from me?
mtDNA subclade K1b2b. Father's Y-DNA I-S25383
GEDmatch kit; CF7867455
Father's kit; RY1336515
Mother's kit; AF2312865


Kincardineshire
Sheret, Hosie, Valentine, Crow, Beattie, McArthur, Wyllie.
Angus (Forfarshire)
Adam, Valentine, Ewan, Elder, Guild, Kydd, Bradford, Stronner, Gibson, Cloudsley, Evans, Stewart, Stott.
Perthshire
Small, Robertson, Murray, Kennedy, McGregor
Ross & Cromarty
Cameron, Stewart, Grant
Banffshire - Gamrie
Anderson, Massie

Offline Adrian Stevenson

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 62
    • View Profile
Re: DNA Testing - Why Not
« Reply #203 on: Saturday 29 April 17 19:10 BST (UK) »
Hi Liviani, your basic understanding is correct.

To find out your Dad's Y DNA line, he would need to take a test.

If you tested your Son once is is old enough, this would show his Father's Y DNA line.

Being Female you have two options.

1) Do an MT DNA test. This would show your Mum's line.

2) Do an Autosomal test: this would give you genetic make up inherited from your parents and Grandparents going back about 500 years.

Hope this helps?

Cheers, Ade.
Stevensons of Ruddington. Haplogroup  I FCG24357. MT Haplogroup T2c1. GedMatch number T419829

Offline Guy Etchells

  • Deceased † Rest In Peace
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • ********
  • Posts: 4,632
    • View Profile
Re: DNA Testing - Why Not
« Reply #204 on: Saturday 29 April 17 19:56 BST (UK) »
Illegitimate children rarely inherit their father's surname.  DNA doesn't lie, but unfortunately people do.  I remember reading somewhere that as many as 60% of children do not know their biological father.  However, on a subject like this, it's difficult to collect reliable data.



It is assertions like this that makes me laugh.
DNA testing is very much in its infancy and is based on tiny samples.
Nothing has as yet been proven as definitive. Babies have been observed being born but when their DNA has been tested it does not match their mother's DNA.

Perhaps in 20 or 30 years things may have changed but now DNA testing is little more than an expensive toy that proves nothing but claims much

Cheers
Guy
http://anguline.co.uk/Framland/index.htm   The site that gives you facts not promises!
http://burial-inscriptions.co.uk Tombstones & Monumental Inscriptions.

As we have gained from the past, we owe the future a debt, which we pay by sharing today.

Offline Liviani

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 576
    • View Profile
Re: DNA Testing - Why Not
« Reply #205 on: Saturday 29 April 17 21:11 BST (UK) »
Hi Liviani, your basic understanding is correct.

To find out your Dad's Y DNA line, he would need to take a test.

If you tested your Son once is is old enough, this would show his Father's Y DNA line.

Being Female you have two options.

1) Do an MT DNA test. This would show your Mum's line.

2) Do an Autosomal test: this would give you genetic make up inherited from your parents and Grandparents going back about 500 years.

Hope this helps?

Cheers, Ade.

This is very helpful indeed. Thank you. So the autosomal test is more restrictive in time than say an MT line?
mtDNA subclade K1b2b. Father's Y-DNA I-S25383
GEDmatch kit; CF7867455
Father's kit; RY1336515
Mother's kit; AF2312865


Kincardineshire
Sheret, Hosie, Valentine, Crow, Beattie, McArthur, Wyllie.
Angus (Forfarshire)
Adam, Valentine, Ewan, Elder, Guild, Kydd, Bradford, Stronner, Gibson, Cloudsley, Evans, Stewart, Stott.
Perthshire
Small, Robertson, Murray, Kennedy, McGregor
Ross & Cromarty
Cameron, Stewart, Grant
Banffshire - Gamrie
Anderson, Massie

Offline shellyesq

  • RootsChat Moderator
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • ********
  • Posts: 13,634
    • View Profile
Re: DNA Testing - Why Not
« Reply #206 on: Saturday 29 April 17 21:36 BST (UK) »
Perhaps in 20 or 30 years things may have changed but now DNA testing is little more than an expensive toy that proves nothing but claims much

I found my birthfather's family through DNA testing, so certainly not an expensive toy for me.  I can provide you with many news stories with a similar result to mine.  I've also tested my husband's DNA, and his matches conform with the paper trail. 

I'd certainly be interested to see a story that supports your claim that a child's DNA doesn't match their mother's without some unusual medical explanation for it.  The law of my country certainly finds that DNA legally proves where a child comes from.  I imagine it's the same in yours.