Author Topic: 1841 unclear census  (Read 2009 times)

Offline Liz_in_Sussex

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 909
  • "We wunt be druv."
    • View Profile
1841 unclear census
« on: Tuesday 27 December 11 17:03 GMT (UK) »
Hi,

I am having trouble reading the occupation and first name of someone in 1841.  He is transcribed on Ancestry as "James Hayward Pritchard" although I think it is quite clear that although he is in a household with Pritchards, his surname is only Hayward.  His first name is transcribed as James ... but I don't agree.  :o

In this extract he is the third from the bottom.  Also, am I right in thinking he was not born in county?

It was actually George Pritchard that brought me to this census - and I was interested to see him living with someone who shared the name of his future Grand-son-in-law!

Thank you!

Liz  :D

PS The reference is Class: HO107; Piece 1145; Book: 4; Civil Parish: Birmingham; County: Warwickshire; Enumeration District: 12; Folio: 23; Page: 4
Research interests:
Sussex (Isted, Trusler, Pullen, Botting), Surrey (Isted), Shropshire (Hayward), Lincolnshire (Brown, Richardson), Wiltshire (Bailey), Schleswig-Holstein (Isted),  Nordrhein-Westfalen (Niessen).

Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline sillgen

  • RootsChat Honorary
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 11,523
    • View Profile
Re: 1841 unclear census
« Reply #1 on: Tuesday 27 December 11 17:06 GMT (UK) »
Jn for John perhaps?   Coach maker?  I am sure it is a no for not born in county as the Y is much clearer in the entries above.
Andrea

Offline Liz_in_Sussex

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 909
  • "We wunt be druv."
    • View Profile
Re: 1841 unclear census
« Reply #2 on: Tuesday 27 December 11 17:08 GMT (UK) »
 :D

That was quick - I definitely thought John - and I wondered about something to do with coaches!  I was also hoping he wasn't born in county as I think he may come from Shropshire!  :D

Thanks very much,

Liz
Research interests:
Sussex (Isted, Trusler, Pullen, Botting), Surrey (Isted), Shropshire (Hayward), Lincolnshire (Brown, Richardson), Wiltshire (Bailey), Schleswig-Holstein (Isted),  Nordrhein-Westfalen (Niessen).

Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline genjen

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,427
    • View Profile
Re: 1841 unclear census
« Reply #3 on: Tuesday 27 December 11 17:31 GMT (UK) »
I agree with Coach Maker but the christian name, I think, could be either Jno ( John) or Jas ( James). A very difficult one to read!

Jen
All Census Look Ups Are Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

ESS: Howe French Cant Annis Noakes Turner Marshall Makerow Duck Spurden Harmony
SCT: Howe Shaw Raitt Milne Forsyth Birnie Crichton Duncan McBeath Daniel Hay Robertson Jaffrey Smith McDonald Alexander Craighead
NRY: Bushby Smith Bland Iley Cunion Kendrew Thornbury Favell Lonsdale Crossland Rudd Pratt Gibson
WES; Dickenson Jackson Ewbank Waller
STS: White
SRY: Knight
DUR: Smith Littlefair
HAM: Williams Grose Lush Venson


Offline Liz_in_Sussex

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 909
  • "We wunt be druv."
    • View Profile
Re: 1841 unclear census
« Reply #4 on: Tuesday 27 December 11 21:32 GMT (UK) »
 :o Oh dear!  I was hoping for John - but I see how it could be James - as the transcriber has put.

Thank you for replying!

Liz  :D
Research interests:
Sussex (Isted, Trusler, Pullen, Botting), Surrey (Isted), Shropshire (Hayward), Lincolnshire (Brown, Richardson), Wiltshire (Bailey), Schleswig-Holstein (Isted),  Nordrhein-Westfalen (Niessen).

Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Gadget

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 57,141
    • View Profile
Re: 1841 unclear census
« Reply #5 on: Tuesday 27 December 11 21:49 GMT (UK) »
Hi  :)

I read it as Jn (for John) Hayward and another  site transcribes him as this. A further site has transcribed him as just J Hayward, although the person below him - who seems to have the same first name as him - is transcribed as Jn May.


James would normally be abbreviated as  Jas


gnu

PS - not born county  :)
Census &  BMD information Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk and GROS - www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk

***Restorers - Please do not use my restores without my permission. Thanks***

Offline genjen

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,427
    • View Profile
Re: 1841 unclear census
« Reply #6 on: Tuesday 27 December 11 21:59 GMT (UK) »
I agree that it is most likely Jn but I honestly think it could be Jas.

And yes, born out of county.

Jen
All Census Look Ups Are Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

ESS: Howe French Cant Annis Noakes Turner Marshall Makerow Duck Spurden Harmony
SCT: Howe Shaw Raitt Milne Forsyth Birnie Crichton Duncan McBeath Daniel Hay Robertson Jaffrey Smith McDonald Alexander Craighead
NRY: Bushby Smith Bland Iley Cunion Kendrew Thornbury Favell Lonsdale Crossland Rudd Pratt Gibson
WES; Dickenson Jackson Ewbank Waller
STS: White
SRY: Knight
DUR: Smith Littlefair
HAM: Williams Grose Lush Venson

Offline dobfarm

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,793
  • Scarcliffe village Derbyshire
    • View Profile
Re: 1841 unclear census
« Reply #7 on: Tuesday 27 December 11 22:47 GMT (UK) »
The J-whatever seems repeated on the entry underneath Hayward  J- May Or Nay

Have a look at other pages to see if the census recorder made some larger more clearer Ja's Jn'o Jo. They maybe is the area on the 1851c
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Any transcription of information does not identify or prove anything.
Intended as a Guide only in ancestry research.-It is up to the reader as to any Judgment of assessments of information given! to check from original sources.

In my opinion the marriage residence is not always the place of birth. Never forget Workhouse and overseers accounts records of birth

Offline sillgen

  • RootsChat Honorary
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 11,523
    • View Profile
Re: 1841 unclear census
« Reply #8 on: Wednesday 28 December 11 08:22 GMT (UK) »
I have looked at other pages and oddly he seems to have written the names in full on some occasions.  Is it worth trying to trace Jn May later?
Andrea