Restore if possible & a date would be great

[trish1120]

Daug Ella born c 1844, Victoria who Married Robert Copland LETHBRIDGE 1863 age 19.

I couldnt help myself and found a Tree earlier and have traced Robert back with his Parents and Grandparents in Cornwall.
If you have a Tree on Anc Salmonblue you will have received several PM's from me

If not PM me on here and I will give you more details;
Robert Lethbridge 1838's father;
Robert Copland LETHBRIDGE Baptised 16 Jan 1801, St Mary Launceston, Cornwall
Parents CHRISTOPHER/MARY
He was privately baptised earlier though 17 Aug 1798.
(This fits with his age at Death and Death Reg in Aust.)

Parents;
Christopher 1761 died 1830, OccpTown Clerk and Mary nee COPLAND
Christophers Parents JOHN, Clerk and Sibella LUXMOORE/Luxmore

Trish

[trish1120]

I St** that one up just wanted to add Robert Lethbridges 1838's Father was...

[jim1]

Daug Ella born c 1844, Victoria who Married Robert Copland LETHBRIDGE 1863 age 19.

She sounds a good candidate Trish.

jim

[SalmonBlue]

Early/mid 1860s for a date. Unfortunately printing and scanning won't work at all, it has to be a scan of the original photo. As you can see, the quality of the resolution isn't improved by this method, as you can't add pixels that aren't there.

Cheers,
China

Thanks for the info China and sorry about the picture, it seemed a good idea at the time after doing a 12 hour night shift and messing about on the laptop for a couple of hours. I thought i did some of my best work when i was tired lol

thanks for taking the time

Darren

[SalmonBlue]

Hi.........Another for the collection.

Carolyn 

  Many thanks Carolyn she looks great

So about the quality of the picture............................will try to better in the future

Darren

[SalmonBlue]

a try

sylvia


http://blog.findmypast.co.uk/2011/05/family-photos-what-are-they-wearing/

Hi Sylvia

Many thanks for the link. Will be very helpful

Darren

[SalmonBlue]

To me this Woman does not look to be in her 40's even in the origanal emailed photo.
A daughter of Michael/Eleaonor perhaps.
Agree 1860's Photo though.

Trish

Have to agree with Trish,she looks in her 20's & possibly married as she has her left hand in a prominent position.Agree early-mid 1860's so someone born around 1840 I would say.

jim

Hi Trish and Jim

Many thanks for taking the time. I must admit I thought she looked younger but I'd put it down to some healthy living in the rural setting by the sea in Australia. 

also your both right with the date googled E de Balk & it appears he was a Prussia who worked in Melbourne and then around 1860 till 1866 (I think it was) worked in Geelong.

Many thanks

Darren

[chinakay]

I thought i did some of my best work when i was tired lol

Were that the case I'd be doing Nobel Prize quality work right now

[SalmonBlue]

I thought i did some of my best work when i was tired lol

Were that the case I'd be doing Nobel Prize quality work right now

 
Hahahaha