1851/1861 Census FOSTER

[seahall]

Next link to James and Frances is the 1861 census for Cottingham

Sorry forgot the Pg and Folio 

Sch 106 Blind Lane

James Foster Head Mar 24 Mason Stoke Albany
Frances Wife Mar 22 Cottingham
Sarah Ann Daur 2 Cottingham

Also 1871 Census entry

Pg 28 Sch 132

James Foster Head M 35 Stone Mason Stoke Albany
Frances Wife M 33 Cottingham
Sarah Ann Daur 12 Cottingham
Anne Daur 9 Cottingham
John Daur 5 Cottingham
George Son 5 Cottingham

Pg 29
Ethel Daur 3 months Cottingham

Then just after the Census in Cottingham 2 Burials

Pg 133 No 1062
Ethel Forster Cottingham April 14 1871 aged 3 months.

Pg 134 No 1065
James Foster Cottingham June 26 1871 aged 35 years.

There is loads more but it will have to wait to another evening.

It is getting quite complicated don't you think?.

Cheers Sandy

[criggy]

Hi Sandy

Just had a cursory look at all your info but think you may have solved it if the name Henry was an error.

Children I had placed on my tree for Edward & Dinah:

Mary bn abt 1802 Brixworth br 14.2.1887 (84) Stoke (not sure about the burial as there is a married Mary Foster ,widow floating about but in 1851 she was unmarried & at home.

John bn abt 1805 Brixworth br 14.7.1822 (17) Stoke Albany

George bn abt 1807 Brixworth br 5.2.1894 Stoke Albany (mason)

William (mine bn abt 1810 Brixworth br 10.8.1860 aged 50 Stoke Albany (mason)

When I said I didn't have a James I was looking higher up on the tree & didn't notice I did have an illigitimate James born to an Elizabeth.

I had Elizabeth down as another possible daughter of Edward & Dinah (bp place unknown)

Also another possibility was Robert (bp place unknown) as he & wife Elizabeth had a George c 10.10.1830 at Stoke Albany

Lastly there was Sarah c 4.5.1819 at Stoke Albany the only one with a baptism date.

If James was Henry than I think everything fits & Dinah would have been named after her grandmother. He was also a mason so obviously followed the family occupation!

George Foster's daughter Sarah married a William Ingram so Thomas Ingram, witness may be a relative.

Will print everything off & study your info properly before I come to any real conclusions - all very, very interesting. 

Can't thank you enough.

criggy

[criggy]

I couldn't resist a quick look at the IGI for Emanuel Lee (the witness you found) before I switched off.

Found him c 12.12.1830 Wilbarston to William & Grace Lee 
(grandparents of Dinah Foster!)

6 children all bp at Wilbarston including a Sarah Ann who died aged 3.

I then typed in Sarah Lee with parents William & Grace. It came up with Sarah Ann Lees c 29.9.1833 at Stoke Albany dau of William & Grace Lees.

Think we're closing the net 

criggy

[seahall]

Hi Criggy

I think you are but I wouldn't have said that James had a postive link till today.

Found some information that may prove the linkage to your Edward from Brixworth.

Will post tomorrow as really tired and after all these years hopefully another day will be okay.

Cheers Sandy

[seahall]

Hi Criggy

I found a marriage of James Foster and Elizabeth Lee in the Sept Qtr of 1855 Mkt Harboro' District (Stoke would come under that) hence grand-daughter being with the Lee's on the 1861 Census.

The reason I was unsure of the linkage I confirmed by finding the death of Elizabeth aged 19 before 1861 and Edward also he stated he was the grand-father of James on the 1851 Census.

I do not have the information with me at the moment but will post later around about 10.00p.m as I am out tonight.

Cheers Sandy   

[seahall]

Hi Criggy

Quote "I had Elizabeth down as another possible daughter of Edward & Dinah (bp place unknown)" I think that what you quote is right although I have not looked into her baptism.

Anyway here is the other info relating to your Fosters.

Burial Stoke Albany Pg 32 No 255

Dinah Foster Stoke Albany February 16th 1847 Aged 71

Burial Stoke Albany Pg 39 No 305

Edward Foster Stoke Albany Nov 17th  1854 Aged 75

Burial Stoke Albany Pg 41 No 321

Elizabeth Foster Stoke Albany Decr 12th 1855 Aged 19.

Cheers Sandy

 

[seahall]

Hi Criggy

From the 1851 Census for Stoke Albany H.O. 107/2079 Pg 17 Folio 236 Sch 23

Edward Foster Head Widr 71 Stone Mason Brixworth
Mary Foster Daur U 48 At Home Brixworth
James Foster Grandson U 14 Stone Mason Stoke

Post some more in awhile.

Cheers Sandy

[seahall]

Hi Criggy

1841 Census for Stoke Albany H.O. 107/797/19 Page 12 Folio 5

Edward Foster 60 Stone Mason Y
Diana Foster 60 Y
Sarah Foster 20 Y
Charles Foster 5 Y

Cheers Sandy

[seahall]

Hi Criggy

Last one for tonight

1841 Census Wilbarston H.O.107/797/24 Page 23 Folio 14

William Lees 40 Ag Lab Y
Grace Lees 40 No
John Lees 20 Silk Weaver Y
George Lees 13 Y
Emmanuel Lees 10 Y
Sarah Lees 7 Y
Elizabeth Lees 5 Y ( wife of James Foster)

Cheers Sandy