Author Topic: Old family search seems to have gone now  (Read 8150 times)

Offline MargP

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,168
  • Three generations
    • View Profile
Re: Old family search seems to have gone now
« Reply #9 on: Wednesday 20 June 12 13:44 BST (UK) »
I had the old and the new site saved to my Desk Top, I went into the old site today and it sent me to the new site, so I think it as gone forever, it will be sorely missed

Margp
Family History is a Pandora's box if you don't like what you see find a new hobby,only concentrate on the proven facts and not the facts you think you know.
Jenkins, Radnorshire. Herefordshire, Canada
Coley Dudley.
Baston, Cleobury Mortimer.Wolverhampton
Parker Stafford.
Hammond/s Wolverhampton.Shropshire
Duckworth Cheshire.
Proud Walsall.Proud Cape South Africa
Horton Darlaston.
Stanton Walsall.
Tudor. Radnorshire
Pittaway. Droitwich

Offline Hampshire Lass

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,359
    • View Profile
Re: Old family search seems to have gone now
« Reply #10 on: Wednesday 20 June 12 13:53 BST (UK) »


On Family Search you used to be able to put in parents' names only and sometimes it would show you all the siblings. This was a very useful bit of advice given by someone on this site.  :D

Judy

That's what I mean by "hard to navigate"   ::)

But..... if you scroll down, you can find "search by event"   or "search by relationship"
these are both very useful and work much like before......if the records are on that site  ::)

and then there are the BTs for other areas, if you scroll down further and click on the country    (Durham records are great   :))

So you can filter a little for specific information but I also am not a fan of change  (which is pathetic really!)

Hope that helps you a little.   HL
Best wishes HL


Census information is crown copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline sunflower

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,079
    • View Profile
Re: Old family search seems to have gone now
« Reply #11 on: Wednesday 20 June 12 14:23 BST (UK) »
How do you tell if it's a submitted entry now.  On the old site it was easy, but I haven't been able to figure that one out yet with the new site.

Carol
Derby- Bamford,Slater,Marriott,Lee,Fox,Hopkinson,Hawksley, Furniss, Froggatt, Stodd.
Notts - Breeding, Lacey Marriott ,Kershaw,Chambers,Geeson,Mitchell,Watts,Potts,Slack,Robinson, Cooper
Yorkshire - Potts, Bell, Derbyshire, Kershaw
Worcestershire - Dyson, Summers, Dearn, Jones
Warwickshire - Russon
Leicestershire - Stodd, Sarson, Berridge, Watts, Bradshaw.
Middlesex / Surrey - Markham, Pearce, Kalaher, Barrett

This information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Hampshire Lass

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,359
    • View Profile
Re: Old family search seems to have gone now
« Reply #12 on: Wednesday 20 June 12 14:51 BST (UK) »
That does seem to be  the danger with the new site.

I have found some submitted trees entered at the very bottom of some of the pages (if there are any submitted trees). 
Perhaps this is the only place they'll be and the records available are transcribed ones?
Best wishes HL


Census information is crown copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Offline mshrmh

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,014
    • View Profile
Re: Old family search seems to have gone now
« Reply #13 on: Wednesday 20 June 12 14:54 BST (UK) »
How do you tell if it's a submitted entry now.  On the old site it was easy, but I haven't been able to figure that one out yet with the new site.

Carol

Carol - they come under user submitted family trees or a similar wording - after the other results I think. In general, against each result there is a source type - eg England, Cheshire Parish Registers, 1538-2000; United States Census, 1940

Offline Hampshire Lass

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,359
    • View Profile
Re: Old family search seems to have gone now
« Reply #14 on: Wednesday 20 June 12 14:59 BST (UK) »
So, in a way, that makes the new site more reliable?   :)
Best wishes HL


Census information is crown copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline jc26red

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,345
  • Census information Crown Copyright.
    • View Profile
Re: Old family search seems to have gone now
« Reply #15 on: Wednesday 20 June 12 15:27 BST (UK) »
Like anything new, we have to practice at it but yes its more reliable and has more content.
As always though, transcripts can and do have have errors, remember to mention this in your source details!

Search the burials!  I've been very lucky here, something that was lacking in the old search  :D
Please acknowledge when a restorer works on your photos, it can take hours for them to work their magic

Please scan at 300dpi minimum to help save the restorers eyesight.

Offline mshrmh

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,014
    • View Profile
Re: Old family search seems to have gone now
« Reply #16 on: Wednesday 20 June 12 16:55 BST (UK) »
I've got used to the new site, which I appreciate takes a bit of time. I find it better than the IGI - greater content, both with extra records & extra detail (eg names of father on some of the marriages).

For anyone new to the later version I'd recommend a regular browse of the Collections page(s) for the areas that are of interest as there are Collections that are unindexed images (these say Browse Images) - eg of many parish registers from around the Manchester area. They show the date added or updated & there do seem to be frequent additions - this is a link to the worldwide level you can narrow it to a region or country from the options on the left:
https://www.familysearch.org/search/collection/list

Good hunting!

Offline sunflower

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,079
    • View Profile
Re: Old family search seems to have gone now
« Reply #17 on: Wednesday 20 June 12 17:27 BST (UK) »
Thanks everyone


Carol
Derby- Bamford,Slater,Marriott,Lee,Fox,Hopkinson,Hawksley, Furniss, Froggatt, Stodd.
Notts - Breeding, Lacey Marriott ,Kershaw,Chambers,Geeson,Mitchell,Watts,Potts,Slack,Robinson, Cooper
Yorkshire - Potts, Bell, Derbyshire, Kershaw
Worcestershire - Dyson, Summers, Dearn, Jones
Warwickshire - Russon
Leicestershire - Stodd, Sarson, Berridge, Watts, Bradshaw.
Middlesex / Surrey - Markham, Pearce, Kalaher, Barrett

This information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk