Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6

Author Topic: Still looking for George  (Read 9138 times)

Offline BumbleB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,351
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Still looking for George
« Reply #18 on: Sunday 15 December 13 16:28 GMT (UK) »
1841 - HO 107/1303/15 folio 20, page 8
Rastrick Common
Joseph Hinchcliff (difficult to see whether there is an "e" on the end of the surname) 45 - Ag Lab
Nancy - 40 - Card Setter
William - 14 - Worsted Piecer
John - 12
Eliza - 9
George - 5

All born in county.
Transcriptions and NBI are merely finding aids.  They are NOT a substitute for original record entries.
Remember - "They'll be found when they want to be found" !!!
If you don't ask the question, you won't get an answer.
He/she who never made a mistake, never made anything.
Archbell - anywhere, any date
Kendall - WRY
Milner - WRY
Appleyard - WRY

Offline Milliepede

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 15,350
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Still looking for George
« Reply #19 on: Sunday 15 December 13 16:29 GMT (UK) »
There's a George Hinchcliff in Rastrick age 5 in 1841 with Joseph 45 Nancy 40 William 14 John 12 and Eliza 9.

1851 Rastrick George is still there age 15
Joseph 62 Nancy 56 John 22 Eliza 19
Hinchliffe - Huddersfield Wiltshire
Burroughs - Arlingham Glos
Pick - Frocester Glos

Offline dobfarm

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,812
  • Scarcliffe village Derbyshire
    • View Profile
Re: Still looking for George
« Reply #20 on: Sunday 15 December 13 16:59 GMT (UK) »
Another mistry!

Could be still alive 1861c as cant find a bon Brighouse George 1851c if so Who is the 1856 George burial

1861c

Eliza Isop age 29
George Hinchliffe born Brighouse Joiner aged 26 brother
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Any transcription of information does not identify or prove anything.
Intended as a Guide only in ancestry research.-It is up to the reader as to any Judgment of assessments of information given! to check from original sources.

In my opinion the marriage residence is not always the place of birth. Never forget Workhouse and overseers accounts records of birth

Offline BumbleB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,351
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Still looking for George
« Reply #21 on: Sunday 15 December 13 17:13 GMT (UK) »
1851 - Rastrick Common - HO 107/2297 folio 91 page 42
Joseph Hinchcliffe - 62 - Ag Lab
Nancy - 56 - Bread Maker
John - 22 - Cartwright
Eliza - 19 - Mill girl
George - 15 - Joiner - born Clifton

And in 1861 he is with sister, Eliza, and still a Joiner.

Transcriptions and NBI are merely finding aids.  They are NOT a substitute for original record entries.
Remember - "They'll be found when they want to be found" !!!
If you don't ask the question, you won't get an answer.
He/she who never made a mistake, never made anything.
Archbell - anywhere, any date
Kendall - WRY
Milner - WRY
Appleyard - WRY

Offline dobfarm

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,812
  • Scarcliffe village Derbyshire
    • View Profile
Re: Still looking for George
« Reply #22 on: Sunday 15 December 13 17:46 GMT (UK) »
back to square one. >:(
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Any transcription of information does not identify or prove anything.
Intended as a Guide only in ancestry research.-It is up to the reader as to any Judgment of assessments of information given! to check from original sources.

In my opinion the marriage residence is not always the place of birth. Never forget Workhouse and overseers accounts records of birth

Offline Milliepede

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 15,350
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Still looking for George
« Reply #23 on: Monday 16 December 13 08:19 GMT (UK) »
Well that's good for me if Rastrick George was still alive in 1861 - the 1856 death could still be my George  :D

Loose connection but I have a feeling his brothers widow/son moved to that area when she remarried *
Will check my notes but her name was Mary Bradbury.

* Nope wasn't till the 1870's they were living in Brighouse. 

Do you think this is the correct BMD entry for the 1856 George if I were to order the certificate?

Dec 1856 George Hinchliffe
Halifax 9a 225
Hinchliffe - Huddersfield Wiltshire
Burroughs - Arlingham Glos
Pick - Frocester Glos

Offline BumbleB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,351
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Still looking for George
« Reply #24 on: Monday 16 December 13 08:55 GMT (UK) »
The death registration in Halifax District is probably the George Hinchliffe buried at St Mathew, Rastrick on 21 December 1856, aged 20.

There is another burial at All Saints, Silkstone of George Hinchliffe on 26 October 1856, but he is an infant of Silkstone.  And that is possibly the entry in Huddersfield Registration District in the December quarter of 1856 as George Hinchliff.

Transcriptions and NBI are merely finding aids.  They are NOT a substitute for original record entries.
Remember - "They'll be found when they want to be found" !!!
If you don't ask the question, you won't get an answer.
He/she who never made a mistake, never made anything.
Archbell - anywhere, any date
Kendall - WRY
Milner - WRY
Appleyard - WRY

Offline Milliepede

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 15,350
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Still looking for George
« Reply #25 on: Monday 16 December 13 11:05 GMT (UK) »
Thank you I might just take a chance on the Halifax one then.  Just hope the informant is someone in the family or I will be none the wiser  :D

His mother was still alive then and appears on several of her children's certificates so fingers crossed.
Hinchliffe - Huddersfield Wiltshire
Burroughs - Arlingham Glos
Pick - Frocester Glos

Offline dobfarm

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,812
  • Scarcliffe village Derbyshire
    • View Profile
Re: Still looking for George
« Reply #26 on: Monday 16 December 13 11:31 GMT (UK) »
Millie

Study well before paying out on GRO certificates and double check before buying (As they say in the building trade-Measure twice and cut once). Its best to buy Certificates from local register offices, as they ask you questions and discuss the issue! from records info infront of them before you buy to try and make sure its the right certificate.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I think you maybe misreading whats been put

Its the George the joiner who was still alive 1861 in Clifton

This is the George Hinchliffe who died in 1856  Rastrick aged 20

below

There's a George Hinchcliff in Rastrick age 5 in 1841 with Joseph 45 Nancy 40 William 14 John 12 and Eliza 9.

1851 Rastrick George is still there age 15 Joseph 62 Nancy 56 John 22 Eliza 19




Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Any transcription of information does not identify or prove anything.
Intended as a Guide only in ancestry research.-It is up to the reader as to any Judgment of assessments of information given! to check from original sources.

In my opinion the marriage residence is not always the place of birth. Never forget Workhouse and overseers accounts records of birth
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6