Hi Phil,
Thanks so much for these - I will follow that likely Joseph linkand see where I get.
You have me intrigued about Wm and Mary Ann though. I have their marriage cert - 1 Mar 1874 Hook Norton, but also these census records which do not fit in with the baptismal records at all it seems.
Here is 1871: Emily H Eden abt 1865 Hook Norton, Oxfordshire, England Daughter Hook Norton Oxfordshire
George Eden abt 1868 Hook Norton, Oxfordshire, England Son Hook Norton Oxfordshire
John E Eden abt 1870 Hook Norton, Oxfordshire, England Domestic Hook Norton Oxfordshire
Mary Ann Eden abt 1843 Clonmel?, Ireland Head Hook Norton Oxfordshire
William Eden abt 1866 Banbury, Oxfordshire, England Son Hook Norton Oxfordshire
William Haynes abt 1843 Hook Norton, Oxfordshire, England Boarder Hook Norton Oxfordshire
and here they are again in 1881:
Ann Maria Haynes abt 1873 Hook Norton, Oxfordshire, England Daughter Hook Norton, Oxfordshire, England
Elizabeth Haynes abt 1878 Hook Norton, Oxfordshire, England Daughter Hook Norton, Oxfordshire, England
Fred Haynes abt 1875 Hook Norton, Oxfordshire, England Son Hook Norton, Oxfordshire, England
George Haynes abt 1868 Hook Norton, Oxfordshire, England Son Hook Norton, Oxfordshire, England
John E. Haynes abt 1870 Hook Norton, Oxfordshire, England Son Hook Norton, Oxfordshire, England
Mary A. Haynes abt 1843 Ireland Wife Hook Norton, Oxfordshire, England
Thomas Haynes abt 1880 Hook Norton, Oxfordshire, England Son Hook Norton, Oxfordshire, England
William Haynes abt 1843 Hook Norton, Oxfordshire, England Head Hook Norton, Oxfordshire, England
William Haynes abt 1866 Banbury, Oxfordshire, England Son Hook Norton, Oxfordshire, England
Later, (according to 1891 census) there is Rosa (82) Frank (85) and Ellen (87)
All surnames are "Eden" in 71 and "Haynes" from 81 onwards.
I assumed they simply didn't marry till later, however the earliest 4 children may have had a different father???
Any light you can shed would be much appreciated!!!
best wishes, Alison