Author Topic: Burial Record - St Mary, Illingworth  (Read 1641 times)

Online BumbleB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,317
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Burial Record - St Mary, Illingworth
« Reply #9 on: Thursday 28 March 13 08:43 GMT (UK) »
And now I know, as if I didn't before, why I failed Latin at school  ;D

Amo, amas, amat, amamis, amatis, amant  ;)
Transcriptions and NBI are merely finding aids.  They are NOT a substitute for original record entries.
Remember - "They'll be found when they want to be found" !!!
If you don't ask the question, you won't get an answer.
He/she who never made a mistake, never made anything.
Archbell - anywhere, any date
Kendall - WRY
Milner - WRY
Appleyard - WRY

Offline genjen

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,427
    • View Profile
Re: Burial Record - St Mary, Illingworth
« Reply #10 on: Thursday 28 March 13 10:20 GMT (UK) »
Bah! I wrote the abbreviated form in my reply because that's what it actually said on the document. But I knew it was short for uxor. I should have stuck my oar in when you were discussing cases etc!  ;) ;D
All Census Look Ups Are Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

ESS: Howe French Cant Annis Noakes Turner Marshall Makerow Duck Spurden Harmony
SCT: Howe Shaw Raitt Milne Forsyth Birnie Crichton Duncan McBeath Daniel Hay Robertson Jaffrey Smith McDonald Alexander Craighead
NRY: Bushby Smith Bland Iley Cunion Kendrew Thornbury Favell Lonsdale Crossland Rudd Pratt Gibson
WES; Dickenson Jackson Ewbank Waller
STS: White
SRY: Knight
DUR: Smith Littlefair
HAM: Williams Grose Lush Venson

Offline dobfarm

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,793
  • Scarcliffe village Derbyshire
    • View Profile
Re: Burial Record - St Mary, Illingworth
« Reply #11 on: Thursday 28 March 13 11:54 GMT (UK) »
In modern terms of thinking as Modern Latin and English, a lot of what has been posted is correct but I say again it depended on the person entering the event!! in the register & when as year. 16 th & 17th century was a mix of old English & Latin.

http://www.omniglot.com/writing/latin.htm

Another difference of modern times and those/them days was titles! today we use Mr and esquire as common place but those times many registers has esquire for a Lords  2nd and later sons. Mr was used for someone of importance as did Yoeman and husbandman the latter exact terms......

This come from looking at thousands of register & old doc's I've seen over many years and Ux, Uxor, Uxor'is, Uxor'us, and Uxor eius mostly enter after the husbands name
What does surprise me is why Bumble B asked! being along genealogist researcher of York Uni  ???
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Any transcription of information does not identify or prove anything.
Intended as a Guide only in ancestry research.-It is up to the reader as to any Judgment of assessments of information given! to check from original sources.

In my opinion the marriage residence is not always the place of birth. Never forget Workhouse and overseers accounts records of birth

Offline sillgen

  • RootsChat Honorary
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 11,523
    • View Profile
Re: Burial Record - St Mary, Illingworth
« Reply #12 on: Thursday 28 March 13 12:29 GMT (UK) »
Post locked at the request of the OP.