Hi Neil,
I can empathise with the gardening (just been out tidying up and dead heading) but I'll leave Eurovision to you!
I've had another look at the Ambrose Barnard (I'll stick to 'Barnard') question but I think I'm still going around in ever decreasing circles trying to get to the bottom of it.
I have no definite proof that the Roos born Ambrose is 'mine' - its all circumstantial and probably wouldn't stand up in a court of law, but - what the hell - here's my theory:
My line goes back through Thomas Barnard, baptised 1772 in Walkington, East Yorks, son of Ambrose & Ann (nee Marshall). In 1791, Thomas married Ann Tindal (again: Tindale, Tindill etc) in the parish of Rowley, EYks. The Rowley parish included a village called Little Weighton (or Weeton) which is where my earlier Barnards lived for a few generations at least. It is also just up the road from Walkington.
Thomas & Ann had 2 daughters baptised in Rowley and then a son Ambrose baptised in nearby Skidby in 1794 but died 1795. They then had another Ambrose baptised in Skidby in 1797. Incidentally, this Ambrose married Jane Ganton in Roos in 1828 and emigrated to Ontario, Canada, to be followed out there by a few of the sons of his sister Jane who is my 3xgreat grandmother.
Thomas Barnard was buried in Little Weighton in 1797. He was only 25 years old. The burial entry in the parish register doesn't give the cause of death and I haven't been able to find local newspapers that go that far back that might have reported an accident of some kind.
His widow Ann remarried to a Thomas Clark in 1798 in Skidby and they had a daughter Betty baptised and buried there in 1797. After that it becomes a bit murky! 2 more children followed, baptised in Skidby, but the baptism entries in the PRs describe both as 'Charity, daughter of Ann Clark' in 1801 and 'William, son of Ann Clark' in 1805. Yet, when young William is buried in 1810 he becomes 'the son of Thomas & Ann Clark'. After that, I lose track of Thomas & Ann Clark but their only surviving child together - Charity - pops up marrying in Holmpton in 1821 (when one of the witnesses was an Ambrose Barnett!)and again in Swine - both places more in the Roos area of EYks. This is what leads me to believe that Ann Barnard Clark - with or without her second husband - moved to this area with her surviving children (Ambrose marries in Roos and my Jane marries in Keyingham - all east of Hull).
This is where I point out that the 'other' daughter of Thomas & Ann Barnard baptised 1792 in Rowley was Mary - and I'm pretty sure that it is this Mary who has a 'natural' son baptised in Skidby in 1811. Wouldn't it make sense that she would go on to have another - Ambrose - in Roos in 1816?
Also, I've looked at the marriage entry in 1839 in Aughton for Ambrose Barnard & Mary Walks and one of the witnesses is John Thruston Tindal who was baptised in Roos in 1807 and is the son of my Jane's and your Mary's uncle Richard Tindal - so is her cousin . What relation would that have made him to the 1816 Ambrose? Second cousin?
Sorry - I've gone on a bit! Its very hard to unravel it all without explanations.
I've tried to find Ambrose's mother Mary on the early censuses but failed dismally. Neither could I find any sign on them of his grandmother Ann Clark. And I haven't found the significance of Ogram either! I did wonder if it could have been the name of Ambrose's father.
Actually, typing all that out has served to chrystalise it more in my mind and I think its a good case! What do you think? I'll be interested to hear what you make of it.
best wishes,
Jill