Pages: [1]

Author Topic: The photo itself is not a clear one  (Read 547 times)

Offline maf6

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 48
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
The photo itself is not a clear one
« on: Friday 07 June 13 02:56 BST (UK) »
I scanned this as 600 and it is the best I could bring up I hope someone would be kind enough to have a go at it.  Thankyou. Maryse.

Offline stevew101

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,388
  • Stotfold Boy
    • View Profile
Re: The photo itself is not a clear one
« Reply #1 on: Friday 07 June 13 06:08 BST (UK) »
Here is one for you
**Please ask if you wish to modify my restores**    HFD Turner-Warwick-Gentle-Game-Harris-Howard-Clements-Gould-James-Lee-Cooper-Castle-Pallet-Hide-Barns-Watts-Swain-Shatbolt-Bonfield-Gundrill-Izard-Impy-Ellis-Carter-Honour BFD Gentle-Tansley-Bly-Rowney-Wilshire-Fisher-Tingay-Ivory-Clark SFK Jay-Norman-Ship ESX Jay-Mann-Gould-Fletcher MIDDX Roberts-Longe AUSTRALIA - Henry Gentle 1795-1865

Offline em

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 315
    • View Profile
Re: The photo itself is not a clear one
« Reply #2 on: Friday 07 June 13 06:39 BST (UK) »
One from me.  Your scan is only coming out at 72 ppi that's why it is so small.

Regards

em
bristol:  cleeve;  beese
Any census information included in this post is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline japeflakes

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,309
    • View Profile
Re: The photo itself is not a clear one
« Reply #3 on: Friday 07 June 13 06:45 BST (UK) »
You may have scanned it at 600dpi but I have it at 72dpi and it is a very small file size for a 600dpi

Perhaps you saved it for "the web" and reduced the dpi:
Anyway
Pages: [1]