Author Topic: A challenging one - looking for the arrival of Thomas Amos and family  (Read 3245 times)

Offline judb

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 6,987
    • View Profile
Re: A challenging one - looking for the arrival of Thomas Amos and family
« Reply #18 on: Sunday 01 September 13 08:10 BST (UK) »
Freebmd has this birth registration, which fits with the ages given on his marriage and death certs.

March Qr 1839, registered Elham, Vol 5 p162
George AMOS   

Elham is in Kent, near to Folkestone
http://www.freebmd.org.uk/cgi/search.pl

Neil it was not uncommon for children to be baptised at a later date, rather than as babies.

Judith
DYER - Wilts, London, Somerset, MIDLANE - Hants, Wilts, SONE - Hants, WRIGHT - London, Hants, SEAGER - Deptford, DWYER, FERGUSON - Victoria, MASON - Woodford Vic, BALLARD - South Wales, GOULDBY - Lowestoft
"Time present and time past are both perhaps present in time future..." T S Eliot

UK Census information Crown Copyrightt, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Neil Todd

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,393
  • "Oportet vivere"
    • View Profile
Re: A challenging one - looking for the arrival of Thomas Amos and family
« Reply #19 on: Sunday 01 September 13 08:21 BST (UK) »
[quote

Neil it was not uncommon for children to be baptised at a later date, rather than as babies.

Judith

[/quote]

Doh, should have put my brain in gear before moving off :-[ Of course it wasn't. :-X

1839 fits nicely with the marriage. But how old when he arrived here as a child.  ???
Neil
Grewl,Nickerseens,flombastion,Everheads

Offline Neil Todd

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,393
  • "Oportet vivere"
    • View Profile
Re: A challenging one - looking for the arrival of Thomas Amos and family
« Reply #20 on: Sunday 01 September 13 08:31 BST (UK) »
Just maybe this could be followed up.
Unnassisted immigrants
AMOSS J/T   London P 23 Apr 1854 Melbourne 399 Miner

Neil
Grewl,Nickerseens,flombastion,Everheads

Offline Westy11

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,770
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: A challenging one - looking for the arrival of Thomas Amos and family
« Reply #21 on: Sunday 01 September 13 10:12 BST (UK) »
Neil
Thanks for your persistence - it is great!  Now as I am a bit of a novice on some things can you please interpret  the following please?  Did you find it on Ancestry please?

AMOSS J/T   London P 23 Apr 1854 Melbourne 399 Miner

Judith - the possible birth is definitely food for thought and will have a look at that one - as you say it fits with the dates provided!

Mmar0


Offline Neil Todd

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,393
  • "Oportet vivere"
    • View Profile
Re: A challenging one - looking for the arrival of Thomas Amos and family
« Reply #22 on: Sunday 01 September 13 11:35 BST (UK) »
He is on the list of unnassisted immigrants into Melbourne in 1854. That is if the right one ???

Neil
Grewl,Nickerseens,flombastion,Everheads

Offline Westy11

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,770
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: A challenging one - looking for the arrival of Thomas Amos and family
« Reply #23 on: Sunday 01 September 13 13:21 BST (UK) »
Hi Neil
Thanks a million - we checked it out but dont think that is the right one!!!   :'(

Back to the drawing board I fear

Nite
mmar0

Offline judb

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 6,987
    • View Profile
Re: A challenging one - looking for the arrival of Thomas Amos and family
« Reply #24 on: Sunday 01 September 13 14:02 BST (UK) »
Neil, I can't see the immigration record you quote.  Was it on Ancestry or the PROV site?

Mmar0, why have you discounted this record?

Did Thomas and Anne emigrate as well?  I wonder if George came as part of a child migration scheme?

Sopry - no answers, only questions  ???

Judith

DYER - Wilts, London, Somerset, MIDLANE - Hants, Wilts, SONE - Hants, WRIGHT - London, Hants, SEAGER - Deptford, DWYER, FERGUSON - Victoria, MASON - Woodford Vic, BALLARD - South Wales, GOULDBY - Lowestoft
"Time present and time past are both perhaps present in time future..." T S Eliot

UK Census information Crown Copyrightt, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Flattybasher9

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,360
  • Manners cost nothing, and are worth the effort.
    • View Profile
Re: A challenging one - looking for the arrival of Thomas Amos and family
« Reply #25 on: Sunday 01 September 13 14:28 BST (UK) »
Strangely enough, Ancestry has the folowing in 2 trees :-
Thomas Amos, death, 5 Oct 1875 in  Denbighshire, Wales.
Anne Tilby, death 22 Dec 1888 in  Denbighshire, Wales.
Them being the parents of George Amos, birth 1839 in Kent, England, death 1908 in Woonona, New South Wales.

A George Amos sponsored several miners and their wives to N.S.W. in 1862. Surnames, Amos and Arnold.
Isaac Amos (Miner)
Ellen Amos (Wife)
James Arnold (Miner)
Hannah Arnold (Wife)


Regards

Malky

Offline Dundee

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,074
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: A challenging one - looking for the arrival of Thomas Amos and family
« Reply #26 on: Sunday 01 September 13 15:08 BST (UK) »

A George Amos sponsored several miners and their wives to N.S.W. in 1862. Surnames, Amos and Arnold.
Isaac Amos (Miner)
Ellen Amos (Wife)
James Arnold (Miner)
Hannah Arnold (Wife)


Regards

Malky

I have had a look at this family and there doesn't seem to be any obvious connection to our George.  The immigration record states that Isaac was George's brother, and Hannah ARNOLD was his sister.  Their parents were Stephen and Sarah.  They appear to stay in Newcastle, whereas our George was in Wollongong.

I think the choice of the Thomas and Ann in Denbighshire as George's parents is because they are the only Thomas and Ann AMOS who appear together as a family on the 1851 census.  Their son Edward was born c1845.  In 1861 Thomas is a milkman, and in 1871 he is a farmer.

I doubt that this is the correct couple.  I think that Ann is Ann ELLIS and they married in 1843, but that is just a guess, and she could have been a widow?

Debra  :)