« Reply #82 on: Saturday 05 October 13 18:23 BST (UK) »
"working class aristocracy " what does that even mean? It's an oxymoron if ever there was one. I'm guessing you're trying to elevate your own working class ancestors above other working class people of the day by using an ill-fitting term to define yours as being the highest echelons of said class?
I'm not a judgemental person generally, but reading your post it comes across as quite arrogant; when including the rest of the content, not simply your inability to avoid the manifest contradiction of your lexical choices.
I'm British, of mainly Scottish and English ancestry, and I think so called "black sheep" are par for the course. I don't seek them out, I don't hold a party every time I find them. However, they are certainly interesting, they have character, and there is a hell of a lot more information on them than other, what could be titled by your description "bog standard", family members. Many of these "black sheep" are victims of the age in which they live; poverty was rife, and the lower classes were discriminated against massively. They're not "nasty" for the most part. The fact you're also trying to generalise it to some kind of "English" (incorrect use of demonym by the way) phenomenon, is ludicrous and your evidence, spurious.
Scott, Scougall/Scougale/Scowgal/Scugall, Sharpe/Sharp, Selkirk/Selkrigg, Armstrong, Dent, Sanderson, Hugill, Thompson, Jester/Juister/Juster, Bell, Drysdale, Cason, Randall, Gascoigne, Redford, Renner, Twizell, Cooke, Jex, Malcolm, Black, Johnstone, Weetman, Arrowsmith, Parkes, Jackson, Granger, Green, Boldock, Boot, Coverdale, Bartholomew, Chapman, Day, Kilvington, Atkinson, Motterham, Smith, Clerk, Grey, Patterson, Henderson, Pride, Dobbie, Ainger, Willis, Ashburn, Donald, Ward, Landales