suzard -- was the action between Arthur Langton and Mr. Bird (Maria Bird Sproston's father)?
It sounds as if it was deciding whether the estate would go to Archibald's heirs or Maria's heirs.
If Archibald predeceased Maria, his estate would have gone to her in the moments before her death, and then to her heirs.
If Maria predeceased Archibald, then her estate would have gone to him in the moments before his death - as the court seems to have decided - and then to his heirs.
Whichever one predeceased would have left no estate for his/her heirs, as presumably each left his/her estate to his/her spouse.
So it sounds like that was what was happening -- and Arthur was claiming through Archibald? For Archibald to be his uncle, either Archibald had a brother with the surname Langton, or he had a sister who married a Langton (or had a child with the surname Langton) ... Essentially, Mrs. Prescott would have to be Archibald's sister, or the wife/widow of his brother.
Smokey, it could help if we know the source of your query. You are related to somebody in this tale?
Knowing who, and what else you know about them, could be useful info.
- edit - I'm just going to leave all this here, since it took me so long ...
The surname LANGTON doesn't seem to appear in any BMD event in South Australia:
http://www.genealogysa.org.au/resources/online-databases.htmlIf Arthur Langton was about 23 in 1929, he was born about 1906. There is a death notice shown in the Ryerson Index
http://ryersonindex.net/search.phpfor
LANGTON Arthur Morgan (Sharks) aged 50 in 1958. Arthur Morgan Langton was born in 1908 in Chipping Norton. He married Frances Lillian Powell in Auburn NSW in 1939.
http://www.bdm.nsw.gov.au/cgi-bin/Index/IndexingOrder.cgi/search?event=marriagesI would think the likelihood of there being two Arthur Langtons about the same age in Australia around then was low. His parents were Arthur and Rose. The family travelled to Sydney in 1912. His 1958 death record shows his parents as Arthur Decimus and Rose Mary.
http://www.bdm.nsw.gov.au/cgi-bin/Index/IndexingOrder.cgi/search?event=birthsFather Arthur died in 1928. Mother Rose died in 1929 (just too early to be on available electoral rolls). Rose's death record gives her parents as Samuel and Harriet. These dates could all just fit -- except that mother Rose was still a Langton. Perhaps not officially remarried?
Arthur Decimus Langton and Rose Mary S Betteridge married in 1899. Rose was born in Chipping Norton in 1875. It would be nice to know what her "S" stood for. Her mother Harriet says she is a widow in 1871 and 1881 ... but in 1881 she has a couple more kids than in 1871.
There's no obvious Samuel Betteridge to fit.
In 1930 there are two Arthur Langtons in Australia: the one discussed above in Reid NSW, and Arthur Langton in East Sydney NSW. In 1936, an Arthur Douglas Langton appears in Queensland. These are the only candidates. There is no Arthur or Rose Langton before 1930 -- which is perhaps a good indication that they were in South Australia before that: SA is not included in the electoral roll database at Anc'y; this would match perfectly with the newspaper report saying Arthur was in Adelaide in 1929 (but note that NSW is covered only from 1930 anyway).
This Arthur's sisters probably married:
Dorothy M to Lawrence Post, 1931 Auburn
Edith M to Harold P Blackett, 1922 Auburn (died 1961)
If I'm unlucky, Arthur Langton is the person you know all about. If not, this seems to be a good working theory as to his identity -- but so far no connection with Archibald John Sproston!!
And what was that "(Sharks)" in Arthur's name when he died?
-- Ah, just a nickname; many of the death notices show them (Dot for Dorothy, etc.)
just adding:
http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/16576072?searchTerm=%20%22rose%20mary%20langton%22&searchLimits=ROSE MARY LANGTON, late of Auburn New South Wales Widow, died 31st May. 1929, Intestate Administration granted to the Public Trustee on 13th August 1929.
(edit - corrected - I had copied the machine transcription of the article which said she died 1919, when it was actually 1929 --
which is apparently too early for her to be the subject of the November 1929 newspaper article about the bones)
and now .........
This is the article about Arthur Langton's claim to AJ Sproston's estate quoted in the OP:
http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/53438293(it really helps to have the sources)
It gives her name. MRS.
EVA PRESCOTT.
Yup, the things one should do before setting out ... checking that all the available info is available ...
Which kind of matches up with
EVA SPROSTON, unmarried niece of George Sproston in 1901.
Of course, there is no birth of an Eva Sproston (c1881), and still no marriage of a Langton to an Eva/Sproston or a Prescott to a Langton that fits ...
btw, this is Archibald in 1911:
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.1.1/XWDG-K11in Tunbridge Wells, place of birth stated as Hampstead -- mistranscribed there as Archibald S Morton, and elsewhere as Spwoston.