Author Topic: **COMPLETED** HUDDERSFIELD MARRIAGE 1865  (Read 1887 times)

Offline broadysword

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 308
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
**COMPLETED** HUDDERSFIELD MARRIAGE 1865
« on: Sunday 08 December 13 17:23 GMT (UK) »
 Anychance someone knows or can confirm for me the identity of the bride who married a ALFRED HIRST in the Sept qtr 1865 in the district of Huddersfield. The census of 1871 gives her first name as Elizabeth. Can find no Elizabeth on freebmd or Yorkshire marriages on Ancestry. Would welcome any help in solving her surname.

Offline lizdb

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 25,307
    • View Profile
Re: HUDDERSFIELD MARRIAGE 1865
« Reply #1 on: Sunday 08 December 13 17:37 GMT (UK) »
If you look at the imagefor that marriage, the ref is 4a 977,  not 971 as it has been indexed.

If you look for others with that ref, you find

Joseph Garside
Elizabeth Hirst
Ann Whiteley
4th groom missing

So, one can conclude the 4 th groom is your Alfred, and he married Elizabeth Hirst - maybe a cousin or second cousin or some other distant rellie?
Edmonds/Edmunds - mainly Sussex
DeBoo - London
Green - Suffolk
Parker - Sussex
Kemp - Essex
Farrington - Essex
Boniface - West Sussex

census information is Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Online BumbleB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,312
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: HUDDERSFIELD MARRIAGE 1865
« Reply #2 on: Sunday 08 December 13 19:50 GMT (UK) »
In case anyone else thinks of reporting the error to FreeBMD - I have done so.  The page for Alfred Hirst is 477, but as it is a hand-written index page it is easy to mis-transcribe it as 471  :(

Therefore lizdb is correct.  :) :)
Transcriptions and NBI are merely finding aids.  They are NOT a substitute for original record entries.
Remember - "They'll be found when they want to be found" !!!
If you don't ask the question, you won't get an answer.
He/she who never made a mistake, never made anything.
Archbell - anywhere, any date
Kendall - WRY
Milner - WRY
Appleyard - WRY

Offline broadysword

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 308
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: HUDDERSFIELD MARRIAGE 1865
« Reply #3 on: Sunday 08 December 13 20:23 GMT (UK) »
Amazing, many thanks to both of you. Your detective work has solved a puzzle for me at least. I could not be sure but I believed Elizabeth could also have the surname of Hirst.
My grateful thanks once again.


Offline avm228

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 24,827
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: HUDDERSFIELD MARRIAGE 1865
« Reply #4 on: Sunday 08 December 13 20:33 GMT (UK) »
It may or may not be her maiden name - could be a previous married name. There are so many Hirsts in the Huddersfield area that it's not that surprising to find them marrying each other :)
Ayr: Barnes, Wylie
Caithness: MacGregor
Essex: Eldred (Pebmarsh)
Gloucs: Timbrell (Winchcomb)
Hants: Stares (Wickham)
Lincs: Maw, Jackson (Epworth, Belton)
London: Pierce
Suffolk: Markham (Framlingham)
Surrey: Gosling (Richmond)
Wilts: Matthews, Tarrant (Calne, Preshute)
Worcs: Milward (Redditch)
Yorks: Beaumont, Crook, Moore, Styring (Huddersfield); Middleton (Church Fenton); Exley, Gelder (High Hoyland); Barnes, Birchinall (Sheffield); Kenyon, Wood (Cumberworth/Denby Dale)