Ancestry "new search" disaster Part two

[KGarrad]

I wonder if they have ever done a survey about the average age of their customer?  If they are aiming at the younger market, they may be wrong.

Judging by the state of the many trees on Ancestry, I suspect they may be right!

[msr]

was only a suggestion no need for a stewards enquiry

Sorry raa, I presumed, seemingly incorrectly, that you were asking a question.   

Not wanting to think you were being ignored, I answered with my own thoughts.

[mosiefish]

And just for nostalgia for all those that used to use the old search, here is a glimpse of the old census search without having to scroll up and down and use sliders (arghh!).  It was so much more compact and easier to use.

Mo

[msr]

See Mo, that was sensible, wasn't it.

Just ask it a simple question and it came up with the goods, not always but more often than not.

[BumbleB]

I hate to say it, but I'm getting to like this new search.

I've made contact with a member of my Kendall family, who lives in New Zealand, just because I didn't tick the "UK and Ireland" box.  And I've just found an entry in the 1861 census that I would never have found if I hadn't done the same thing for an "Appleyard" name.