Author Topic: Drawing a family tree  (Read 2988 times)

Offline ThrelfallYorky

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,647
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Drawing a family tree
« Reply #9 on: Sunday 25 May 14 16:44 BST (UK) »
I've in the past, and when planning, done something similar to your separate sheets, Doddsie, and if I'm on a work in progress / planning, then, as I said, pencil is the thing. I also "do" branches on smaller pads, obviously, if I'm dealing with one branch rather than the overview.

It's very possible IF you make an error, to use a fibreglass eraser, then an indiarubber, then a cowrie shell or similar as a burnisher to make the surface impeccable again - but actually, if you set it out carefully and fully, and adjust at the pencil stage, prior to inking in, there's very little need.

Oddly enough, I tend to start at the foot of the sheet, and work upwards.

I don't think I could get on with "stickers" - but little *s or similar direct the viewer/reader to a panel in a spare space somewhere where extra information can be put.
But I had the impression that the OP (Nookie) was thinking of something more or less complete in itself, and as a visual presentation.

Do give it a go - it really does produce an effective image for display, and, as I said, if you have the skills you can pop a coat of arms ( if you have one - I never have had any in the families) or other decoration in corners.
There's no one perfect way - as Doddsie says, if you are doing branches on different pages the same layout won't do for all - but that's the beauty of the huge sheet and pencil, and having your "minitrees" to hand to help you integrate them into one  good layout as you draw them in.

The research for the first/ full one took me years. Assembling the  "mini-trees" and planning how/where to place them, and sketching out the main structure took a day or so, off and on. Then drawing it out accurately took an intensive day ( I prefer to work that way).
I then left that for a couple of days, looked at it again, made minor adjustments to the layout, and when I was reasonably happy, got out the pen!
Then I started to "ink in" - if anything a little smaller than I'd written it in the first time. I think this stage was done from the top corner downwards, actually, for practical purposes. I left a margin round and afterwards did some lining in and minor decoration. It did look good, and was easy to follow.
For someone else I did the linking lines in a different colour for each marry-in line, they found that helpful.
It isn't a huge task. Researching and accumulating the evidence is the huge task.
This is the fun bit of the organisation, and how people who are not as fascinated by it all as we are, come to understand what we're doing.
Go on - give it a try. Get that big sheet. Get all your stuff together. I started on the first one by using my main "paternal" line more-or-less as the main trunk, and branching off maternal and marry-in lines as I went up, so it was easy to understand. You can do it.
Threlfall (Southport), Isherwood (lancs & Canada), Newbould + Topliss(Derby), Keating & Cummins (Ireland + lancs), Fisher, Strong& Casson (all Cumberland) & Downie & Bowie, Linlithgow area Scotland . Also interested in Leigh& Burrows,(Lancashire) Griffiths (Shropshire & lancs), Leaver (Lancs/Yorks) & Anderson(Cumberland and very elusive)

Offline Nookie

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,024
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Drawing a family tree
« Reply #10 on: Sunday 25 May 14 17:24 BST (UK) »
You are so encouraging - thanks a lot.  I have already started and think that I am going to try doing it the way you suggested, but using the idea of the one I found on the net which was done on the current US President.  I like the idea of a tree with roots except for the bit about having to put my family down the bottom and my husband's at the top :)

Doing it this way will, I hope, enable me to distinguish between both families and their roots.  I have managed to get parts of both families back into the 1600's, so I am hoping that it will be practical.

Looking at the bits I have done so far I  think that once I have it all down it should work - it is just going to take a lot of planning as to how to incorporate everything! 

Really appreciate all your input.
Fulton-Ireland
Barber
Woods

Offline ThrelfallYorky

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,647
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Drawing a family tree
« Reply #11 on: Sunday 25 May 14 18:33 BST (UK) »
Not sure I fully understand how you mean about "Roots" and an American President's tree - do you mean a sort of mirror-image, like on a playing card, centred on you and your other half, and one tree heading up to the top of the sheet, and one to the bottom? Sounds interesting, if a bit more tricky. As you've seen, the key to it all is the planning. It would work just as well done the conventional way, I'm sure, but whatever way you do it. it will be worth trying. Back to the 1600s should be no problem - one of my lines goes a lot further back, and most of the rest (except the Irish who only go mid 1800s!) to about 1600, so there's plenty of room. Good luck.
Threlfall (Southport), Isherwood (lancs & Canada), Newbould + Topliss(Derby), Keating & Cummins (Ireland + lancs), Fisher, Strong& Casson (all Cumberland) & Downie & Bowie, Linlithgow area Scotland . Also interested in Leigh& Burrows,(Lancashire) Griffiths (Shropshire & lancs), Leaver (Lancs/Yorks) & Anderson(Cumberland and very elusive)

Offline Nookie

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,024
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Drawing a family tree
« Reply #12 on: Sunday 25 May 14 19:07 BST (UK) »
I found the tree while googling for ideas.  It was done by, I think, a (British) newspaper, showing the Obama line.

It has him as the centre of the tree with his maternal line as the tree and his paternal line as the roots.  As we only have a son I thought I would reverse it and put the paternal line as the tree.  In some ways it looks easier than trying to combine both lines in the tree.  Mind you I will have to try it out to be sure !

It would be interesting to hear your thoughts - google it and hopefully you will find it and see what I mean.
Fulton-Ireland
Barber
Woods


Offline ThrelfallYorky

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,647
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Drawing a family tree
« Reply #13 on: Monday 26 May 14 16:04 BST (UK) »
Ah! I've googled Mr O's tree presented in a range of ways. It's amazing how many there seem to be. It seems a bit of a novelty, but - why not? I would suggest though that a format that allows your son to add to it in years to come, to ensure that it remains a family heirloom, could be a good idea. ( That's partly why I start low down, but leaving spaces towards the bottom of the sheet.)
It's you doing it, and you know best how you want it to look.
Threlfall (Southport), Isherwood (lancs & Canada), Newbould + Topliss(Derby), Keating & Cummins (Ireland + lancs), Fisher, Strong& Casson (all Cumberland) & Downie & Bowie, Linlithgow area Scotland . Also interested in Leigh& Burrows,(Lancashire) Griffiths (Shropshire & lancs), Leaver (Lancs/Yorks) & Anderson(Cumberland and very elusive)