Thanks all for your suggestions....it's food for thought
I am also tending to think the first letter may indeed be a badly written "E" but who knows
Will now try it from another aspect and see if I can trace it from one of the two daughters mentioned but on initial searching through the Victorian records there is a reference to a Louisa who matches closely and referred to herself as a "HENSLEY"......similar mother's details.
Am yet to obtain her certificates at this stage. Only problem being she is listed as being born in Victoria, not Tasmania where the mother was assumed to have married....again, the age factor is not credible
Certainly not saying it is the same person at this stage and further research is needed, but John's surname doesn't look like HENSLEY to me......Bearing in mind the informant was the grand daughter of the deceased, then she may not have been aware of the actual name spelling of her grand mothers first husband other than what she had heard and it may have been recorded as ENSLEY.....
Just doesn't look like ENSLEY to me... ?
Yes, it's not clear cut unfortunately and there are lots of avenues to pursue so will keep looking....thank you all so much for your suggestions, it's greatly appreciated