Mystery wedding - date please, if possible, to help identify

[Wiggy]

She's changed the side she parts her hair  - correct?   

[IgorStrav]

Yes, she has, Wiggy - but perhaps the permanent waves looked better that way?

I've changed mine a couple of times.....

[Wiggy]

She does look right doesn't she!       

Yes, she has, Wiggy - but perhaps the permanent waves looked better that way?

I've changed mine a couple of times.....

I can't - it doesn't go the other way!! 

[IgorStrav]

She does look right doesn't she!       

Yes, she has, Wiggy - but perhaps the permanent waves looked better that way?

I've changed mine a couple of times.....

I can't - it doesn't go the other way!! 

 


In the first picture it's swept back without a definite parting, and in her wedding picture it's almost a central parting.

But ignoring the hair, don't you think her face/nose and also how she holds her head for a picture are all the same - I'm always making my "mirror" and "picture" face in a photo    My daughter does too, it's very funny seeing us looking with our special faces in the same mirror. 

[Wiggy]

She does look very similar doesn't she!     I'm not saying it isn't her.   

just thinking . . . . . . .    

Just put the two photos together and I reckon you could be correct - the other person it could be is the second from the right - back row!     

[spices]

It's the girl third from left at the back, Spices - can't see her legs! 

I think it is this lady - here she is at her own wedding

So sorry I was looking at the wrong person, was looking at the bride.

[chirp]

I really think it is the same lady - the area around the eyes in particular looks the same.

[IgorStrav]

Thanks to all for your comments - no worries, Spices, about looking at the wrong person, all comments welcomed 

Awaiting the opinion of my cousin from whom the photo came - he found it in the collection of the son of the young girl we think we've identified - so it's a member of the family's wedding, but whose?