Author Topic: Lost from the 1851 census  (Read 5616 times)

Offline Trees

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,116
  • Can't see the wood for the !!!
    • View Profile
Re: Lost from the 1851 census
« Reply #9 on: Friday 24 April 15 19:44 BST (UK) »
 lizdb sorry I can't type too quickly i have cataracts so it takes time finding the keys
Here is your answer
As always with this family there are several problems
There is a burial of a Mary Robinson in St Martin from Adderley St  24 Jan 1859 age 60 address Adderley St
But Frances Nock was the daughter of James and Mary nee Robinson and Elizabeth Joseph and David were children of Francis and Mary Robinson and to add to the confusion Their Elizabeth married William the brother of John Bailey Nock, So I can't be sure if the Mary who died in 1839 was widow of James or William Robinson
Yes JenJ I have just found her too she looks like the one buried in 1859 but which one is she  how can i sort all these Marys put? and where was David
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

For details of my research interests please see
mcmullin.me.uk
Also read the children a story from Story Time at the same web site.

Offline Trees

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,116
  • Can't see the wood for the !!!
    • View Profile
Re: Lost from the 1851 census
« Reply #10 on: Friday 24 April 15 19:52 BST (UK) »
I know James married Mary kirkham by licence in 1819 I wonder if I can find a Mary Kirkham in Kingston Hereford
None on Family search and with Francis buried from there earlier it looks as this is the wife of Francic  now who was she?
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

For details of my research interests please see
mcmullin.me.uk
Also read the children a story from Story Time at the same web site.

Offline Trees

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,116
  • Can't see the wood for the !!!
    • View Profile
Re: Lost from the 1851 census
« Reply #11 on: Saturday 25 April 15 10:26 BST (UK) »
Silly me it is obviously the wife of Frances. In 1851 she is a worsted shoe maker , Francis was also a shoe maker so it makes sense that she too would make shoes. She is at 145 while the shop was 148 but it was James's daughter at the sho[ not Francis's I really think James and Francis must have been brothers but Ithe only time i find James is his weddinf=g and the baptism of Frances. I think there must be some sort of connection between David and Frances too. David was son of Francis the shoe maker BUT he turns up as nephew of Frances daughter of James the bricklayer a He gets baptised at 12 while no one else in his family were baptised and then when he marries he gives the right name for his father but says his occupation was builder ..which was the occupation of James \i wonder if he lived with James at some time.
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

For details of my research interests please see
mcmullin.me.uk
Also read the children a story from Story Time at the same web site.