Author Topic: Deciphering unusual variation of Elizabeth?  (Read 3049 times)

Offline Alfred Moynte

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 20
    • View Profile
Deciphering unusual variation of Elizabeth?
« on: Friday 08 July 05 04:43 BST (UK) »
When I saw the transcription "Elispil" I thought well that's a sloppy job, let's download the image and we'll have a look ourselves. But I can't imagine what else it could be.  To top that, a search of FreeBMD for likely suspects produces the equally unique "Elspact". 

I suppose it must be Elizabeth (no sisters so named) but I wonder was it so difficult to convey that name correctly twice?

No sign of her in 1891 unfortunately.

I'd be glad to hear your thoughts.

Alfred


Offline Little Nell

  • Global Moderator
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • ********
  • Posts: 11,805
    • View Profile
Re: Deciphering unusual variation of Elizabeth?
« Reply #1 on: Friday 08 July 05 14:20 BST (UK) »
I think they are trying to convey "Elspeth" or maybe even "Elspeath" which is a variant of Elizabeth.

Nell
All census information: Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Alfred Moynte

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 20
    • View Profile
Re: Deciphering unusual variation of Elizabeth?
« Reply #2 on: Saturday 09 July 05 02:26 BST (UK) »
Yes I suppose that must be it. Elspeth. I will keep an eye out for the name elsewhere in the family.
Thank you Little Nell.
Alfred

Offline PrueM

  • RootsChat Honorary
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 12,637
  • Please don't try to PM me :)
    • View Profile
Re: Deciphering unusual variation of Elizabeth?
« Reply #3 on: Saturday 09 July 05 03:02 BST (UK) »
In Scottish records one often finds Elspet or Elspit interchangeable with Elizabeth.
Prue