Author Topic: Emily Eaton 1837-1905  (Read 23482 times)

Online BumbleB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,317
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Emily Eaton 1837-1905
« Reply #144 on: Tuesday 25 August 15 17:15 BST (UK) »
As is usual with Family Search - NO  >:( As I'm sure you can see for yourself  ;)
Transcriptions and NBI are merely finding aids.  They are NOT a substitute for original record entries.
Remember - "They'll be found when they want to be found" !!!
If you don't ask the question, you won't get an answer.
He/she who never made a mistake, never made anything.
Archbell - anywhere, any date
Kendall - WRY
Milner - WRY
Appleyard - WRY

Offline chr1st1an

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 298
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Emily Eaton 1837-1905
« Reply #145 on: Tuesday 25 August 15 17:25 BST (UK) »
I can't see for myself  :'( (I'm not a member of familysearch).

Maybe when I get to him (Joseph Webb), the marriage or the census will clarify his forename.
As for the date of birth, I will accept 1873.  :)

About John Pool born in Durham, one of the censuses says Lince Green or Lintz Green, Durham. And Wikipedia says that Lintz Green was a railway station which opened with the rest of the line on 2 December 1867.   ??? Does this make sense to anybody?

Online BumbleB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,317
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Emily Eaton 1837-1905
« Reply #146 on: Tuesday 25 August 15 17:34 BST (UK) »
You don't have to be a member of Family Search to view their records - I'm certainly not a member.  Just go onto the website, select Search, then Records, then Location (map of the world appears), click on the British Isles, which will then ask you for a particular country.  Alternatively click on the link provided by ladyhawk.

Transcriptions and NBI are merely finding aids.  They are NOT a substitute for original record entries.
Remember - "They'll be found when they want to be found" !!!
If you don't ask the question, you won't get an answer.
He/she who never made a mistake, never made anything.
Archbell - anywhere, any date
Kendall - WRY
Milner - WRY
Appleyard - WRY

Offline Ladyhawk

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 10,463
    • View Profile
Re: Emily Eaton 1837-1905
« Reply #147 on: Tuesday 25 August 15 18:54 BST (UK) »
I can't see for myself  :'( (I'm not a member of familysearch).

Here's the link to search https://familysearch.org/search

Eliza Twigger Webb marriage details also on family search


About John Pool born in Durham, one of the censuses says Lince Green or Lintz Green, Durham.

1901 gives pob Lintz Green Durham

From family search John's pob given as Staffordshire 1871c & Durham 1881c  :-\

https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:KZGG-DMT
John POOLE born c1867 Staffordshire

https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:XQFB-4GP
John POOL born c 1866 Durham

There are these two birth entries (FreeBMD)

Sep 1866 Dudley vol 6c page 135
John POOLE

Mar 1867 Durham vol 10a page 300
John POOL


Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Offline chr1st1an

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 298
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Emily Eaton 1837-1905
« Reply #148 on: Tuesday 25 August 15 22:46 BST (UK) »
Thanks Ladyhawk!  :)
At first I also thought that Durham might had been a transcript error of Dudley, but seeing Durham stated so many times I think the boy was born at Durham Co.

But I see nothing in Lintz Green (a couple of roads that intersect, the river, and the railroad, and a nearby colliery where father Robert Poole might have worked (Hamsterley Colliery).

Offline Ladyhawk

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 10,463
    • View Profile
Re: Emily Eaton 1837-1905
« Reply #149 on: Wednesday 26 August 15 08:40 BST (UK) »

At first I also thought that Durham might had been a transcript error of Dudley, but seeing Durham stated so many times I think the boy was born at Durham Co.

But I see nothing in Lintz Green (a couple of roads that intersect, the river, and the railroad, and a nearby colliery where father Robert Poole might have worked (Hamsterley Colliery).


In 1870-72, John Marius Wilson's Imperial Gazetteer of England and Wales described......

LINTZ-GREEN, a township in Tanfield chapelry, Chester-le-Street parish, Durham; on the river Derwent
………………… http://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/place/25859

TANFIELD, a village, a chapelry, and a sub-district, in the district and county of Durham. ……………….
The chapelry includes Beamish and Lintz-green township, and is in Chester-le-Street parish
 http://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/place/411


Mar 1867 Durham vol 10a page 300
John POOL


TANFIELD is in the registration district of Durham so possibly the above is John's birth entry you would need to check the b/c to confirm parents names



Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline chr1st1an

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 298
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Emily Eaton 1837-1905
« Reply #150 on: Wednesday 26 August 15 11:30 BST (UK) »
A friend of mine suggested that John Pool might have been born in the last quarter of 1866 and then registered in MAR qtr. 1867 at Durham Co.

Thank you also for the marriage details of Eliza Twigger Webb. I have started the search for all Emily's children marriages. Here they are in the order the brothers and sisters were born (not the marriage year):

Abraham POOL + Mary Jane PRICE (DEC 1879 PONTEFRACT)

Thomas POOL + Hannah PRIKE (JUN 1885 WAKEFIELD)

Samuel Joseph POOL + Catherine FOSTER (MAR 1884 WAKEFIELD)
...and years later + Emily Jane DAY (DEC 1909 ECCLESALL B.)

John POOL + Mary Jane APPLEBY (JUN 1889 WAKEFIELD)

Emily POOL + Josiah LEAVESLEY (DEC 1888 PONTEFRACT)

Any help to find the remaining marriages would be hugely appreciated! Thanks!!!

Offline chr1st1an

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 298
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Emily Eaton 1837-1905
« Reply #151 on: Wednesday 26 August 15 17:25 BST (UK) »
About Elijah Webb:
In 1901 he was living with his parents Emily and Peter Webb. Age: 24, Occupation: Coal Miner Hewer. Single or Not married.
In 1911 he was living with sister Sarah Jane and husband Frederick Shaw. Age: 34. Single.
Occ: None, and the census says "cripple".   :(

DEATH DEC 1911 Pontefract
Elijah WEBB (35)  :'(

Offline chr1st1an

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 298
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Emily Eaton 1837-1905
« Reply #152 on: Wednesday 26 August 15 18:29 BST (UK) »
Remaining marriages of Emily's children:

Elijah WEBB - Never married

Sarah Jane WEBB + Frederick SHAW (JUN 1898 PONTEFRACT)

Eliza Twigger WEBB + Leonard PARKER (DEC 1900 PONTEFRACT)

David William WEBB + Letitia CANEY (DEC 1909 PONTEFRACT)

Peter WEBB + Esther Annie ROBERTSON (JUN 1911 PONTEFRACT)

The only one left is Joseph (or Joseph William) Webb, born 1873 Featherstone...
In 1911 he is a Boarder at 92 Featherstone Square, Single, 37, Coal Miner Hewer...
Can anyone please help me find his marriage (is there was one)?