Just adding a couple of notes and thoughts.
On the 1891, when we see Ursula ALCOCK with her family, I note her father Robert's occupation is Rubber Miner (?)
India Wonder if there was an association between the families or just co-incidence.
I think the little stillborn baby born to Catherine NORTON cannot be connected to this particular Catherine NORTON. For her to be the mother would mean too much expensive travelling back and forth to England for a lass who sewed shirts and then finally arrived in 1911 with "assistance" as a General Servant.
Sue
Sue
