Author Topic: The worst Ancestry transcription ever?  (Read 88950 times)

Offline trystan

  • Administrator
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • ********
  • Posts: 14,150
  • RootsChat Co-founder
    • View Profile
Re: The worst Ancestry transcription ever?
« Reply #63 on: Thursday 22 September 16 00:01 BST (UK) »
Generally speaking, it does make you wonder if the method used for transcribing some records (and I'm not saying this is how it's done in these cases) is by recording people reading text, and then using speech-to-text software to 'transcribe' it. Some examples sound as if it's the syllable sounds that are transcribed possibly? It may be a really effective method a lot of the time but come with the errors that we see at times? Just a thought, that's all.
Send RootsChat a postcard:
RootsChat.com, Europa House, Barcroft Street, Bury, Lancashire, BL9 5BT
Admin Tip: Forgotten your Username or Password and would like to reply to one of these messages?  CLICK HERE to get a reminder.
AOL Users: You may need to 'cut and paste' any links you get in emails for them to work.

Offline ymfoster

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,529
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: The worst Ancestry transcription ever?
« Reply #64 on: Thursday 22 September 16 00:19 BST (UK) »
That sounds very feasible Trystan.  :)

Also people unfamiliar with old style writing misinterpret letters, & then transcribers in foreign countries transcribing the census.  ::)

Yvonne
Restorers may use my restores to colour, acknowledgement appreciated.

Mostly England - <br />Walne Nfk - Argent Barritt Hammond Sfk - Asprey Comber Cribb Gundrey Higgs Plaw Sewell Sumption Sry - Baldwin Bull Nth -  Brumfield Dufty London Wor -  Calverley Greenhalgh Lan - Dodson Stainsby NRY - Denison WRY - Whittle Yks - Dormer Mdx - Felmingham Eng - Grecian Nbl -  Hayse Mass US - Jenner Ounstead Weeding Ssx - McDonald Skye - Campbell McIndoe McMillan Inv - Window Gls

Offline Bookbox

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,919
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: The worst Ancestry transcription ever?
« Reply #65 on: Thursday 22 September 16 00:32 BST (UK) »
The unchallenged champion Worst Ancestry Transcription Ever can be found in the collection All London, England, Freedom of the City Admission Papers, 1681-1925.

Search for Rock Doffethor.

I should like to propose another contender for this award, from the same database.

Search for Wilhout Any.

Offline horselydown86

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,438
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: The worst Ancestry transcription ever?
« Reply #66 on: Thursday 22 September 16 18:27 BST (UK) »
Certainly a solid contender, Bookbox.

I think Rock Doffethor shades it for creativity and I will always admire the way the transcriber simply discarded all the letters which didn't fit his theory.

However, Wilhout Any (and the whole Any family*) wins points for sheer bloody-minded refusal to consider meaning as a useful adjunct to transcription.

*  I see the Any family were prolific suppliers of Freemen to the City.


Offline stonechat

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,676
    • View Profile
Re: The worst Ancestry transcription ever?
« Reply #67 on: Tuesday 27 September 16 14:01 BST (UK) »
Familysearch have some good ones too. My Great great grandfather Staffurth Clarke was transcribed as Huffenth o children's baptisms. Family search have I think a correct version now as well
Douglas, Varnden, Joy(i)ce Surrey, Clarke Northants/Hunts, Pullen Worcs/Herefords, Holmes Birmingham/USA/Canada/Australia, Jackson Cheshire/Yorkshire, Lomas Cheshire, Lee Yorkshire, Cocks Lancashire, Leah Cheshire, Cook Yorkshire, Catlow Lancashire
See my website http://www.cotswan.com

Offline PrawnCocktail

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 663
    • View Profile
Re: The worst Ancestry transcription ever?
« Reply #68 on: Saturday 01 October 16 14:45 BST (UK) »
How about this one -

"The Tmdon Boock" in the new Deddington burials. Reality is The Widow Crockford!
Website: http://freepages.rootsweb.com/~towcesterfamilies/genealogy/
Towcester - anything, any time
Cheshire - Lambert, Houghland, Birtwisle
Liverpool - Platt, Cunningham, Ditton
London - Notley, Elsom, Billett
Oxfordshire - Hitchcock, Smith, Leonard, Taunt
Durham - Hepburn, Eltringham
Berwickshire - Guthrie, Crawford
Somerset - Taylor (Bath)
Gloucestershire - Verrinder, Colborn
Dorset - Westlake

Offline isk

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 255
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: The worst Ancestry transcription ever?
« Reply #69 on: Saturday 01 October 16 15:45 BST (UK) »
An interesting one on an emigration record from London to Sydney calling at a place Marsouffles,  reasonably clearly it should be Marseilles.  isk

Offline Geoff-E

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,210
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: The worst Ancestry transcription ever?
« Reply #70 on: Saturday 01 October 16 19:23 BST (UK) »
Some beauties here - Wales 1851 at Aberystruth, Monmouthshire.

W S Bullard, born Corenhouse - actually William Ballard b Crickhowell
Iza Bullard, actually John Ballard
Mary Anna J Smert, born Frooper, Somerset - actually Mary Ann Sweet b Frome

Without prior knowledge, I'd have trouble agreeing with much of what you say are the correct transcriptions.
Today I broke my personal record for most consecutive days alive.

Offline judb

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 6,987
    • View Profile
Re: The worst Ancestry transcription ever?
« Reply #71 on: Sunday 02 October 16 06:18 BST (UK) »
Hi Geoff-E
Yes, I do have other records which show that my transcription is correct.  The image shows appalling handwriting by the enumerator and is heavily scored  and blotted.  With the information I already had I could make out that the image does have the correct names etc - just very difficult to read and I can see how the mistakes have been made.

Took me a long time to find it though!
HO107/2447/415 p 18

A fascinating thread!
Judith
DYER - Wilts, London, Somerset, MIDLANE - Hants, Wilts, SONE - Hants, WRIGHT - London, Hants, SEAGER - Deptford, DWYER, FERGUSON - Victoria, MASON - Woodford Vic, BALLARD - South Wales, GOULDBY - Lowestoft
"Time present and time past are both perhaps present in time future..." T S Eliot

UK Census information Crown Copyrightt, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk