Is it possible to improve the clarity and definition of this burial record

[MartynS]

The other way i tried was to emboss the image - so to try and raise the script off the page and shadow it to make a lower layer of black ink....still working on that theory and try and see if infrared will work over that better...i know what i mean    will post only if i get somewhere with it....but dont think i will

[relatedtoturnips]

Is someone able to help?

Regards

Can I ask where your record relates to. Sometimes they have 3 scans of the same page, the 3rd scan being much better than the 1st. I have found this to be the case on family search for Bishops Transcripts.

Turnip.

[roycymru]

Hello

Sorry there is only on version of this image available.

However, is anyone able to specifically enhance a particular entry in the attached? The entry is line 9 and I think it says " Margt the Daughter of David Lodwick xtened. I can't work out the date on the left hand side it may say 09 Jan? The first line in the image definitely says Oct as the month and the entries cover Easter 1757 to 1758, so by the 9th line the months may have switched to Jan of the following year.

Regards

[relatedtoturnips]

Hello

Sorry there is only on version of this image available.

However, is anyone able to specifically enhance a particular entry in the attached? The entry is line 9 and I think it says " Margt the Daughter of David Lodwick xtened. I can't work out the date on the left hand side it may say 09 Jan? The first line in the image definitely says Oct as the month and the entries cover Easter 1757 to 1758, so by the 9th line the months may have switched to Jan of the following year.

Regards

I didnt try to enhance it in software, as it didnt make much difference. But I agree with you it looks like 9th Jan.

It starts at the top of the page OCT then many dittos, then NOV many dittos, and then to your entry of JAN as far as my eyes could tell.

[japeflakes]

had a go but...