I've just had a thought - what if the burial for Sarah, dau of George and Sarah is incorrect?
I have had two instances in my research so far of coming across baptisms and burials where it seems the wrong name had been recorded. For example, researching my Westmacott family, the family in the 18th century seemed to be the only one in the village. I found two baptisms for a Thomas, but no child burial for Thomas. Later I found a burial for a William, who's age tallied up with the second baptism, but there was no William baptised. I therefore concluded that the second Thomas was actually a William, and that his name had been recorded incorrectly at baptism, or perhaps it was his second/nick name.
I can't remember the particulars, but I also found this during research of someone else's family a couple of years ago.
I'm just wondering if the child who died is just another daughter of George and Sarah, incorrectly named.
It just seems so strange to have a Sarah Holyoake married in the same church as another Sarah was baptised in, have all the censuses give a birthdate of 1809-1810, in Oxford, and yet...for her to have died in June 1809 with no other candidate for the Sarah I'm looking for.
I know it's clutching at straws, but I'd appreciate any opinions on this theory.
Thanks,
Chris