Hi Deirdre
I've been having a further think about the entry for Ann Harris, Sept Q 1846 (Vol 26 page 427) that has dash in the GRO online index for mothers maiden name.
This date for the entry would fit with the 1851 entry for age 4; would fit with that possible entry in 1861 for an Ann Harris a 'relative' with the old lady Sarah Harries; would fit with being 20 when marrying in September 1866; but is out for her death in 1874 (aged 26).
A search on discussions here on RootsChat about the use of a 'dash' where the entry for the mothers maiden name should be, says:
- either no maiden name (i.e. unmarried)
- maiden name the same as married name (i.e. a Harris marrying a Harris, although the discussion says it would usually still be listed)
- unreadable
- not properly indexed (the advice was to check others indexed on the same page as some people had found a page where many entries had no mothers maiden name)
With this in mind, I went through all the birth entries for Merthyr (vol 26 page 427), for Q2 and Q3 in 1846 and the entry for Ann Harris is the only one with a dash against the mothers maiden name.
My thoughts.....
*totally unrelated birth;
*mothers maiden name is unreadable and it could be your Ann;
*a birth entry for an unmarried relation (to David shoemaker) and David and his wife have taken the child into their home as their own child. If the latter was the case, then Ann may never had known, and could have named David as her father on her marriage certificate.
*of course this still doesn't help with the inconsistency for the registration of David in 1850 (aged 9 months in 1851 census).
*the cholera epidemic in 1849 was catastrophic for Merthyr, 1,600 deaths of a pop of 40,000+; how many children were taken in by other families due to parental deaths -well mainly the mother as father would need to work to live.
Mar