France: Anne L'Homme, born Echiselle

[joger]

and you probably won't find one because the family is obviously still Protestant.
No marriage and burial records for them in the Catholic registers.
They only accepted the Catholic baptism.

https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=ia6kAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA110&lpg=PA110&dq=huguenot+catholic+baptism&source=bl&ots=UqFN4Ba4XR&sig=ir4rL7ETh30Gp7B-dw60FNaxaAE&hl=fr&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiZwpCuyPrVAhXLKVAKHSMJCBgQ6AEIQDAD#v=onepage&q=huguenot%20catholic%20baptism&f=false

Claude de l'homme husband of Simone migh have been a catholic , though his son sas a protestant.
But anyway there are no "registres paroissiaux" before 1692 on Line for st Martin of Nigelles

[joger]

The renouncement was not sincere, because of the persecutions of that time. He still was a protestant in fact, like other people in the village. I found some acts where the curate clearly shows that he doubts about the reality of the conversions. A proof of it for the Lhommes is their exile
In London and their protestant worship
Eglancourt is a hamlet of st Martin de nigelles, the acts are Those of st Martin

We will be sure for Anne of we find more infos but don't presume that a woman of 34 can't have 4 children quickly. Fertility was greater than nowadays, no contraception ,and women had a child every 2years very often,and had children in their forties. One of my ancesters had a child at 53 !

[JenNZL]

Eglancourt is a hamlet of st Martin de nigelles,.

Ah, I see. So does that mean I could possibly also find the birth of Anne Juvin within these same scanned parish records?

Cheers,

Jenni

[joger]

No books  before 1692. Anne Juvin had her first child in 1704, if she married at 15 ( possible in those days) ,she was born in 1688, if she married older than 15 it is still impossible to find her birth act

[davidqueneherve]

http://www.archives28.fr/arkotheque/visionneuse/visionneuse.php?arko=YTo2OntzOjQ6ImRhdGUiO3M6MTA6IjIwMTctMDgtMjciO3M6MTA6InR5cGVfZm9uZHMiO3M6MTE6ImFya29fc2VyaWVsIjtzOjQ6InJlZjEiO2k6MjtzOjQ6InJlZjIiO2k6NjE0ODtzOjE2OiJ2aXNpb25uZXVzZV9odG1sIjtiOjE7czoyMToidmlzaW9ubmV1c2VfaHRtbF9tb2RlIjtzOjQ6InByb2QiO30#uielem_move=-188%2C-357&uielem_islocked=0&uielem_zoom=136&uielem_brightness=0&uielem_contrast=0&uielem_isinverted=0&uielem_rotate=F

In 1713 Frame 166

Burial of Marie TUVIN, 16 months old, daughter of Pierre TUVIN, winegrower, of Eglancourt

16/SEP/1711, Frame 157

Baptism of Marie, daughter of Pierre TUVIN and Catherine LUCAS "ensemble depuis 4 ans de la région prétendüe &"

[JenNZL]

ooh...interesting. So going by dates one would presume Pierre could potentially be a brother of Anne Juvin?

[JenNZL]

We will be sure for Anne of we find more infos but don't presume that a woman of 34 can't have 4 children quickly. Fertility was greater than nowadays, no contraception ,and women had a child every 2years very often,and had children in their forties. One of my ancesters had a child at 53 !

You're right, of course - I just meant that it's more likely she married when she was in her early 20s. 34 seems old for the time, is all - though of course not impossible.

[davidqueneherve]

http://www.archives28.fr/arkotheque/visionneuse/visionneuse.php?arko=YTo2OntzOjQ6ImRhdGUiO3M6MTA6IjIwMTctMDgtMjciO3M6MTA6InR5cGVfZm9uZHMiO3M6MTE6ImFya29fc2VyaWVsIjtzOjQ6InJlZjEiO2k6MjtzOjQ6InJlZjIiO2k6NjE0ODtzOjE2OiJ2aXNpb25uZXVzZV9odG1sIjtiOjE7czoyMToidmlzaW9ubmV1c2VfaHRtbF9tb2RlIjtzOjQ6InByb2QiO30#uielem_move=-890%2C-559&uielem_islocked=0&uielem_zoom=136&uielem_brightness=0&uielem_contrast=0&uielem_isinverted=0&uielem_rotate=F

View 145

25/SEP/1710 Burial of Pierre, son of Pierre TUVIN and Catherine LUCAS

Same view 15/MAY/1710 baptism of Pierre TUVIN, son of Pierre TUVIN, cy devant de la Religion protestant (a former Protestant), and Catherine LUCAS.

The information contradicts itself because in this record, their marriage is said legitimate = a Catholic ceremony.

[davidqueneherve]

ooh...interesting. So going by dates one would presume Pierre could potentially be a brother of Anne Juvin?

As a matter of fact, I read her family name TUVIN rather than JUVIN.

http://www.archives28.fr/arkotheque/visionneuse/visionneuse.php?arko=YTo2OntzOjQ6ImRhdGUiO3M6MTA6IjIwMTctMDgtMjciO3M6MTA6InR5cGVfZm9uZHMiO3M6MTE6ImFya29fc2VyaWVsIjtzOjQ6InJlZjEiO2k6MjtzOjQ6InJlZjIiO2k6NjE0ODtzOjE2OiJ2aXNpb25uZXVzZV9odG1sIjtiOjE7czoyMToidmlzaW9ubmV1c2VfaHRtbF9tb2RlIjtzOjQ6InByb2QiO30#uielem_move=-144%2C-102&uielem_islocked=0&uielem_zoom=136&uielem_brightness=0&uielem_contrast=0&uielem_isinverted=0&uielem_rotate=F

Frame 145

First line, last word Thomas. The letter  is the same. What do you think ?