Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 ... 7

Author Topic: Ellen Burke  (Read 5402 times)

Offline heywood

  • RootsChat Honorary
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 40,869
    • View Profile
Re: Ellen Burke
« Reply #9 on: Sunday 09 July 17 08:09 BST (UK) »
 :-\

Yes I have found that family and wonder if Ellen in 1911 indexes is that Ellen.

The only birth I found was Atkin/Feeney which would not fit with Margaret Ann.
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline chempat

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,568
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Ellen Burke
« Reply #10 on: Sunday 09 July 17 08:11 BST (UK) »
These look like Atkin/Feeney births:

Albert Atkin    Feeney  June quarter 1886  Blackburn
John William Atkin  Feeney   June quarter 1887 Blackburn
Walter Atkin Feeney December quarter 1888 Blackburn

Added:
Assuming James was father, and Margaret Ann aunt, not Elizabeth born to unmarried Mother.

Offline heywood

  • RootsChat Honorary
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 40,869
    • View Profile
Re: Ellen Burke
« Reply #11 on: Sunday 09 July 17 08:13 BST (UK) »
The age doesn't for Margaret A.

Here she is in Darwen in 1901 with her parents James and Margaret but no Ellen.

I can't find Elizabeth Wilkinson in 1901 either

1901 3908/118/15
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline chempat

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,568
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Ellen Burke
« Reply #12 on: Sunday 09 July 17 08:16 BST (UK) »
I think James' occupation on the marriage certificate would be useful.

Offline chempat

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,568
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Ellen Burke
« Reply #13 on: Sunday 09 July 17 08:18 BST (UK) »
Family living in Haslingen in 1891:
James Atkin   29  Blacksmith   Blackburn
Margaret Atkin   30
James T Atkin   6
John W Atkin   3
Ellen Atkin   1

James T wrong?

Offline heywood

  • RootsChat Honorary
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 40,869
    • View Profile
Re: Ellen Burke
« Reply #14 on: Sunday 09 July 17 08:26 BST (UK) »
I am trying to find them in 1901.

I am inclining towards this family but not enough evidence yet is there?
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline chempat

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,568
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Ellen Burke
« Reply #15 on: Sunday 09 July 17 08:29 BST (UK) »
Ancestry has the family in 1901 as Artthen

Offline heywood

  • RootsChat Honorary
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 40,869
    • View Profile
Re: Ellen Burke
« Reply #16 on: Sunday 09 July 17 08:34 BST (UK) »
Thanks  ;)

No Ellen ...
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline chempat

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,568
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Ellen Burke
« Reply #17 on: Sunday 09 July 17 08:49 BST (UK) »
The OP says Ellen went to school in Harrogate, so she could be there in 1901.
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 ... 7