I have a possibility for him but it's somewhat complicated.
On 1891 Census I found a Charles Gibbs bc.1843 Pinvin, Worcs. married to a Sarah bc.1854 Hett, Durham and 5 children, living in Birmingham.
Checked births/census and there wasn't a Charles bc.1843 Pinvin so thought he was worth investigating further.
From births of the children on GRO Index mmn was Chrisop!
Nice to have an uncommon surname to search for - Hett came under registration district of Durham and a Sarah Chrishop was registered Dec.1853 Durham (no other possibilities anywhere near that date).
Now it starts getting complicated - Sarah Chrisop married in March qtr.1873 Durham to a Frederick Charles Gibson - eldest daughter Alice Jane was registered as Gibson mmn Chrisop in March qtr.1874 Durham - next 4 children born in Birmingham, can't find corresponding birth in GRO index for Sarah Ann bc.1879 mmn Chrisop under either Gibson or Gibbs but the next 3 children all registered as Gibbs mmn Chrisop.
However, gets more complicated. In 1881 family of Charles, Sarah, and eldest 2 daughters are in Birmingham with Charles shown as bc.1845 Newcastle, Northumberland
. This threw me for a while but I persevered as wife Sarah and both daughters were identical. In 1901 - still in Birmingham - he is shown as Frederick C. Gibbs bc.1840 Pinvin and died as Frederick Charles Gibbs in Dec.qtr.1908 Birmingham (bc.1839). His daughter Sarah Ann married an Ernest Hughes in 1901 and marriage entry shows father as Frederick Charles Gibbs.
So, we have a Charles Gibbs bc.1840 Pinvin, supposedly a Frederick Charles Gibbs b.1839-1845 (depending on what census you use) also born in Pinvin but there is no such birth for the latter and he doesn't seem to exist. Plus the man who married Sarah Chrisop married as Frederick Charles Gibson with eldest dau. born Gibson too and then by 1881 he's Charles Gibbs (with totally different age/birthplace), Charles Gibbs bc.1843 Pinvin in 1891 and then in 1901 he's Frederick C. Gibbs bc.1840 Pinvin.
Since there is no Frederick Charles born as either Gibbs/Gibson in Pershore Reg.District (Pinvin) ca.1840 I think that he may well be your Charles Gibbs who covered his tracks and not getting found out by marrying Sarah Chrisop under the name Frederick Charles Gibson in 1873, first child registered Gibson and then he becomes Charles Gibbs in 1881 and 1891, Frederick C. Gibbs in 1901 - other children all born as Gibbs. Unfortunately, the 1873 marriage details don't seem to be available online so don't know how, as Frederick Charles
Gibson he described his status i.e. bachelor or widower (both of which would have been a lie anyway).
Apart from the 1881 census' birthplace (perhaps the enumerator made a mistake) all the other census show Pinvin, Worcestershire as place of birth.
Something to consider anyway - I feel sure it's the same person.
Annette