Many people seem to think I am against the concept of using DNA for family history research, I am not.
I am however concerned the DNA is promoted as the panacea that will solve all the researchers’ stumbling blocks and provide the answers, it won't.
As it stands now DNA testing is improving but it is still flawed.
That is why I am pleased to see this latest blog by My Heritage announcing major updates and improvements to their DNA Matching.
http://www.rootschat.com/links/01lfq/
It shows they have recognised the failings in the systems in use and how they are attempting to produce more accurate results.
As the years go by and the various companies’ knowledge and DNA banks grow the science will grow and mature.
We may even reach a stage where some or even many of the claims of some companies will be valid, until that time comes please understand DNA testing does not provide the answers. As with any record set it may provide clues to the answers but as the above blog shows more work has still to be done.
Cheers
Guy
DNA Testing Flawed?
1) Oh No, it isn't.
2) Oh Yes, it can be.
The answer:- 1) or 2) largely depends on how accurate YOUR Tree research is and how thorough the OTHER PERSON's Tree research is?
My Niece (my blood Sister's Daughter) had a DNA Test, the result came back and after comparing, she was in contact with a surname match, who had a list of surnames, from her own research.
I explained to my Niece that surname was in my Mother's lineage (side) AND also a marriage prior to an UNCONFIRMED 1784 - 1787 Birth on my Father's side, might also eventually be that same surname.
I emailed my Niece and when the lady replied (some don't) she fitted in, on my Mother's side and we could see that her research in the Census and GRO Certificates was top-hole (excellent)!
------------
Accuracy of Other Trees and Burden of PROOFThere is a Thread on Rootschat which is questioning the accuracy of Trees.
Rootschatters and myself have been in contact with researchers of online trees WITH THE PROOF confirming they have an error.
But they cannot prove how they made their link AND are NOT prepared to change it.
-----------
Dissenters and Nonconformist
Research indicates two Nonconformist Chapels were already built in one particular town and the Presbyterian BIRTH records for over 100 years are missing before 1797 and about the first 35 years of Wesleyan Births are missing from the 1785 opening.
Early local nonconformist burials there, were generally buried in the Parish Churchyard to start with, but with no clue as to the deceased's religion.
------------
Some Scots had marriage by habit or repute, without formal Marriage, so a marriage might not exist.
-----------
Yes, DNA can be flawed, if one, or both DNA parties research is not thorough enough.
DNA is NOT a golden panacea!
Mark